Applicability of evaluation metrics/schemes for human health burden attributable to regional ozone pollution: A case study in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), South China

Minjuan Huang,Song Tao,Ke Zhu,Huiran Feng,Xiao Lu,Jian Hang,Xuemei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169910
IF: 9.8
2024-01-12
The Science of The Total Environment
Abstract:This is a study to identify the applicable/preferable short- and long-term metrics/schemes to evaluate the premature mortality attributable to the ozone pollution in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), one of the most representative populous ozone pollution regions in China, by comprehensively accounting the uncertainty sources. The discrepancy between the observation and the CAQRA reanalysis datasets (2013–2019) was investigated in terms of the concentration variation pattern, which determines the exposure metric change. A set of domestic short-term C-R coefficients for the all-age population were integrated using the meta-analysis respectively corresponding to the metrics of MDA1, MDA8, and Daily average. The dataset-based deviations of the short-term attributable factors ( AFs ) and their corresponding premature mortalities were respectively about 16.9 ± 13.3 % and <5 % based on MDA8, much smaller than other two metrics; and the MDA8-based evaluation results were the most sensitive to the deteriorative ozone pollution, with the maximum upward trends of 0.095–0.129 %/year. Accordingly, MDA8 was recognized as the most applicable short-term metric. For the long-term exposure, the domestic summer metric SMDA8 could not exactly represent the peak-season ozone maximum level in the GBA, with the deviation from 6MMDA8 as much as 30 %. By considering the ability of metric to represent the peak-season ozone, the relatively smaller dataset-based discrepancies of AFs (6MMDA8-WHO2021: 23.3 ± 16.9 %, AMDA8-T2016: 20.7 ± 15.8 %) and the attributable premature mortalities (6MMDA8-WHO2021: 5 %, AMDA8-T2016: 8 %), and the higher sensitivity of the evaluation results to the deteriorative ozone pollution (6MMDA8-WHO2021: 0.13 %;year, p = 0.01; AMDA8-T2016: 0.15 %/year, p = 0.03), the schemes of 6MMDA8-WHO2021 and AMDA8-T2016 were recognized relatively more preferable for the adult (≥25-year) long-term evaluation. Based on the recognized metric/schemes, the central and the eastern PRE areas of higher NO 2 level in the GBA were experiencing the highest health burdens from 2013 to 2019.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?