Causal inference in retrospective studies

Paul W Holland, Donald B Rubin
1987-06-01
Abstract:CDhilOsophical discussions of causality often emphasize the-r meaning of causation. Scientists are usually concerned with understanding causal mechanisms. Purely statistical discussions of causality are substantially more limited in scope, because the unique contribution of statistics is to measuring causal effects and not to the understanding of causal mechanisms or to the meaning of causation. This distinction is sometimes expressed as" statistics can establish correlation, but not causation." We feel our emphasis on measurement is more appropriate, because it focuses on what statistical theory can contribute to discussions of causality. Measuring causal effects accurately without any understanding whatsoever of the causal mechanismsAUTHORS'NOTE: A version ofthis article titled" Causal Inference in Prospective and Retrospective Studies" was delivered at the Jerome Cornfield Memorial Session ofthe …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?