Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model: A population-based survey in Hong Kong
Martin C S Wong,Eliza L Y Wong,Junjie Huang,Annie W L Cheung,Kevin Law,Marc K C Chong,Rita W Y Ng,Christopher K C Lai,Siaw S Boon,Joseph T F Lau,Zigui Chen,Paul K S Chan,Martin C.S. Wong,Eliza L.Y. Wong,Annie W.L. Cheung,Marc K.C. Chong,Rita W.Y. Ng,Christopher K.C. Lai,Siaw S. Boon,Joseph T.F. Lau,Paul K.S. Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.083
IF: 4.169
2021-02-01
Vaccine
Abstract:BackgroundVaccines for COVID-19 are anticipated to be available by 2021. Vaccine uptake rate is a crucial determinant for herd immunity. We examined factors associated with acceptance of vaccine based on (1). constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), (2). trust in the healthcare system, new vaccine platforms and manufacturers, and (3). self-reported health outcomes.MethodsA population-based, random telephone survey was performed during the peak of the third wave of COVID-19 outbreak (27/07/2020 to 27/08/2020) in Hong Kong. All adults aged ≥18 years were eligible. The survey included sociodemographic details; self-report health conditions; trust scales; and self-reported health outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were applied to examine independent associations. The primary outcome is the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.ResultsWe conducted 1,200 successful telephone interviews (response rate 55%). The overall vaccine acceptance rate after adjustment for population distribution was 37.2% (95% C.I. 34.5% to 39.9%). The projected acceptance rates exhibited a "J-shaped" pattern with age, with higher rates among young adults (18-24 years), then increased linearly with age. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that perceived severity, perceived benefits of the vaccine, cues to action, self-reported health outcomes, and trust in healthcare system or vaccine manufacturers were positive correlates of acceptance; whilst perceived access barriers and harm were negative correlates. Remarkably, perceived susceptibility to infection carried no significant association, whereas recommendation from Government (aOR=10.2, 95% C.I. 6.54 to 15.9, p<0.001) was as the strongest driving factor for acceptance. Other key obstacles of acceptance included lack of confidence on newer vaccine platforms (43.4%) and manufacturers without track record (52.2%), which are of particular relevance to the current context.ConclusionsGovernmental recommendation is an important driver, whereas perceived susceptibility is not associated with acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine. These HBM constructs and independent predictors inform evidence-based formulation and implementation of vaccination strategies.(298 words)
immunology,medicine, research & experimental