Abstract:Background: Despite the importance of prenatal care, quality measurement efforts have focused on the number of prenatal visits, or prenatal care adequacy, rather than the services received. It is unknown whether attending more prenatal visits is associated with receiving more guideline-based prenatal care services. The relationship between guideline-based prenatal care and patients' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics has also not been studied. Objective: This study aimed to measure the receipt of guideline-based prenatal care among pregnant patients and to describe the association between guideline-based prenatal care and the number of prenatal visits and other patient characteristics. Study design: This was a retrospective descriptive cohort study of 176,092 pregnancy episodes between 2016 and 2019. We used de-identified administrative claims data on commercial enrollees across the United States from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. We identified the following 8 components of prenatal care that are universally recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other guideline-issuing organizations: testing for sexually transmitted infections, obstetric laboratory test panel, urine culture, urinalysis, anatomy scan ultrasound, oral glucose tolerance test, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine, and group B Streptococcus test. We measured the proportion of pregnant patients who received each of these guideline-based services at the appropriate gestational age. We measured the association between guideline-based services and the number of prenatal visits and prenatal care adequacy. We described variation of guideline-based care according to patient age, comorbidities, high deductible health plan enrollment, and their county's rurality, health professional shortage area status, racial composition, median income, and educational attainment. Results: The 176,092 pregnancy episodes were mostly among patients aged 25 to 34 years (63%) with few pregnancy comorbidities (81%) and living in urban areas (92%). Guideline-based care varied by service, from 51% receiving a timely urinalysis to 90% receiving an anatomy scan and 91% completing testing for sexually transmitted infections. Patients with at least 4 prenatal visits received, on average, 6 of the 8 guideline-based services. Guideline-based care did not increase with additional prenatal visits and varied by patient characteristics. Rates of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination were lower in counties with high proportions of minoritized populations, lower education, and lower income. Conclusion: In this commercially insured population, receipt of guideline-based care was not universal, did not increase with the number of prenatal visits, and varied by patient- and area-level characteristics. Measuring guideline-based care is feasible and may capture quality of prenatal care better than visit count or adequacy alone.

Who is your prenatal care provider? An algorithm to identify the predominant prenatal care provider with claims data

Provider's Individual and Network Attributes in the Selection Process of a Predominant Antenatal Care Provider in South Carolina: A Case-Control Study

Provider’s Individual and Network Attributes in the Selection Process of a Predominant Antenatal Care Provider in South Carolina: A Case-Control Study

Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Prenatal Care in Insurance Claims Data

Mining care trajectories using health administrative information systems: the use of state sequence analysis to assess disparities in prenatal care consumption

Variation in guideline-based prenatal care in a commercially insured population

Racial and Geographic Variation of Prenatal Care Coordination Receipt in the State of Wisconsin, 2010–2019

Predictors of prenatal care utilization

Quantifying patient and neighborhood risks for stillbirth and preterm birth in Philadelphia with a Bayesian spatial model

Unequal Uptake: Insurance‐Related Disparities in Prenatal Genetic Counseling and Screening at a Quaternary Medical Center

Closing the Gap in High-Risk Pregnancy Care Using Machine Learning and Human-AI Collaboration

303 Social Network Analysis of Patient Sharing Among Providers: Implications for Analyzing Disparities in Cancer Screening

Neighborhood risk and prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island, 2005–2014

The Relationship Between Provider and Patient Racial Concordance and Receipt of Postpartum Care

Prenatal care redesign: creating flexible maternity care models through virtual care

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Effects of Group Prenatal Care On Identification of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial of CenteringPregnancy

How Much is too Much? High Utilization of Prenatal Care and Its Impact on Primary Cesarean Birth Among Women in the United States

Development and evaluation of standardized pregnancy identification and trimester distribution algorithms in U.S. IBM MarketScan® Commercial and Medicaid data

Development and validation of claims-based algorithms for estimating gestational age of spontaneous abortion and termination

Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010

Segregation by Payer in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Ambulatory Care Sites