Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">The identity and institutional image of universities are presented to the world through their websites. On their websites, universities publish their academic offerings, their mission, their vision, their academic objectives, their achievements, their regulations, their news and all their university work. Hence, the importance of university websites is accessible. The accessibility of university websites has been evaluated several times in the past, but there is no work that has summarized all the evaluations performed to provide a general overview of the situation. Therefore, in this research we have performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate, analyze, synthesize and interpret the accessibility results of university websites published in 42 papers that have been selected for this study. The methodology used in this SLR was that proposed in Kitchenham's guidelines, which includes three stages: planning the review, conducting the review and reporting the review. The results present the analysis and synthesis of the evaluations of 9,140 universities in 67 countries. Of these, 38,416 web pages, 91,421 YouTube videos and 28,395 PDF documents were evaluated. Manual methods, methods with automatic tools and the combination of both methods were used for the evaluation. Most websites were evaluated using the ISO/IEC 40500:2012 and Section 508 standards. The accessibility guidelines most commonly violated in the evaluations were: adaptable, compatible, distinguishable, input assistance, keyboard accessible, navigable, predictable, readable and text alternatives. In conclusion, the university websites, YouTube videos and PDF documents analyzed in the 42 papers present important accessibility problems. The main contribution of this SLR is the consolidation of the results of the 42 studies selected to determine the findings and trends in the accessibility of university websites around the world.</p>

Turning manual web accessibility success criteria into automatic: an LLM-based approach

The use of WCAG and automatic tools by computer science students: a case study evaluating MOOC accessibility

An Interactive Mode to Aid Web Accessibility Evaluation

AXNav: Replaying Accessibility Tests from Natural Language

ACCESS: Prompt Engineering for Automated Web Accessibility Violation Corrections

Assessing the Performance of Human-Capable LLMs -- Are LLMs Coming for Your Job?

On the Effectiveness of LLMs for Manual Test Verifications

ASSESSMENT OF WEB ACCESSIBILITY REGULATION ADHERENCE BY INSTITUTIONS WITH COMPLIANCE OBLIGATIONS

An adaptation of SCRUM for accessible websites development focused on testing

Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review

Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Web-Form-Test Generation: An Empirical Study

Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklists

Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences

Exploring Large Language Models to generate Easy to Read content

LLM for Test Script Generation and Migration: Challenges, Capabilities, and Opportunities

A Task Assignment Strategy for Crowdsourcing-Based Web Accessibility Evaluation System

Facilitating and automating usability testing of educational technologies

Automated Evaluation of Web Site Accessibility Using A Dynamic Accessibility Measurement Crawler

The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviews

Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferences

Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs' Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm