EFFECT OF NEBIVOLOL MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINATION THERAPY ON BLOOD PRESSURE LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: META-ANALYSIS OF 91 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Athanasios Manolis,Paschalis Karakasis,Dimitrios Patoulias,Manolis Kallistratos,Maria Koutsaki,Antreas Pittaras,Michalis Doumas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001022176.89219.83
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: The present study aimed to systematically appraise and quantitatively summarize the available evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considering the effect of nebivolol on blood pressure (BP) levels in patients with hypertension. Design and method: The literature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Scopus until December 15, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis. Results: In total, 7,737 participants with hypertension, who were treated with nebivolol, were analyzed across 91 RCTs. Most trials had a high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB2). Nebivolol was associated with significantly greater reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP compared to placebo (MD = -6.01 mmHg; 95% CI= [-7.46, - 4.55] and MD = -5.01 mmHg; 95% CI= [-5.91, -4.11], respectively). Moreover, nebivolol resulted in a similar reduction in systolic BP (MD = -0.22 mmHg; 95% CI= [-0.91, 0.46]) and a significantly greater reduction in diastolic BP compared to active comparator (MD = -0.71 mmHg; 95% CI= [-1.27, -0.16]). When considering the effect of nebivolol on 24-hour ambulatory BP, notable reductions were observed compared to placebo. In contrast, compared to the active comparator, there was no significant difference in ambulatory systolic BP reduction, but a significant reduction in ambulatory diastolic BP favoring nebivolol was noted. Based on moderator analyses, the impact of nebivolol on the pooled estimates remained independent of the duration of RCTs, gender, age, body mass index, history of diabetes or heart failure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that nebivolol resulted in a significant reduction in BP compared to placebo and seemed to be non-inferior to active comparator in terms of BP reduction. When considering the effect of nebivolol on 24-hour ambulatory BP, nebivolol was superior to placebo, while compared to the active comparator, there was no significant difference in ambulatory systolic BP reduction, but a significant reduction in ambulatory diastolic BP. Future, large-scale, and meticulously designed trials are necessary to further establish the place of nebivolol in the treatment algorithm of hypertension.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?