Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: a retrospective observational cohort study
Tyler T Weiss,Flor Cerda,J Brady Scott,Ramandeep Kaur,Sarah Sungurlu,Sara H Mirza,Amnah A Alolaiwat,Ramandeep Kaur,Ashley E Augustynovich,Jie Li,Tyler T. Weiss,J. Brady Scott,Sara H. Mirza,Amnah A. Alolaiwat,Ashley E. Augustynovich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.042
IF: 11.719
2021-01-01
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>The role of prone positioning in intubated subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>We conducted an observational cohort study of intubated patients admitted to our academic medical centre intensive care unit with COVID-19 between March 18-31 2020. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, reintubation and previous prone positioning at a referring hospital. Patients that were placed in the prone position were followed up until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was oxygenation assessed by arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>). Secondary outcomes included PaO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ratio improvement ≥20%. Treatment failure of prone positioning was defined as death or requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Forty-two subjects (29 males; mean age:58.5 [12.7] years) were eligible for analysis. Nine subjects were placed in the prone position only once, with 25 requiring prone positioning on ≥3 occasions. 31/42 (74%) subjects survived to discharge, with 5 requiring ECMO; 11/42 (26.2%) subjects died. Following the first prone positioning session, mean (SD) PaO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ratio increased from 17.9kPa (7.2) to 28.2kPa (12.2) (p<0.01). With repeated prone positioning sessions, 31/42 (73.8%) subjects who were discharged from hospital had PaO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ratio improvement of ≥20%, compared to 11/42 subjects who either died or required ECMO (odds ratio:XX (95% confidence intervals:xx-xx)).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with COVID-19 ARDS frequently responded to initial prone positioning with improved oxygenation. Subsequent prone positioning in subjects discharged from hospital was associated with greater improvements in oxygenation.</p>
anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?