Abstract:Statistical learning using imprecise probabilities is gaining more attention because it presents an alternative strategy for reducing irreplicable findings by freeing the user from the task of making up unwarranted high-resolution assumptions. However, model updating as a mathematical operation is inherently exact, hence updating imprecise models requires the user's judgment in choosing among competing updating rules. These rules often lead to incompatible inferences, and can exhibit unsettling phenomena like dilation, contraction and sure loss, which cannot occur with the Bayes rule and precise probabilities. We revisit a number of famous "paradoxes", including the three prisoners/Monty Hall problem, revealing that a logical fallacy arises from a set of marginally plausible yet jointly incommensurable assumptions when updating the underlying imprecise model. We establish an equivalence between Simpson's paradox and an implicit adoption of a pair of aggregation rules that induce sure loss. We also explore behavioral discrepancies between the generalized Bayes rule, Dempster's rule and the Geometric rule as alternative posterior updating rules for Choquet capacities of order 2. We show that both the generalized Bayes rule and Geometric rule are incapable of updating without prior information regardless of how strong the information in our data is, and that Dempster's rule and the Geometric rule can mathematically contradict each other with respect to dilation and contraction. Our findings show that unsettling updates reflect a collision between the rules' assumptions and the inexactness allowed by the model itself, highlighting the invaluable role of judicious judgment in handling low-resolution information, and the care we must take when applying learning rules to update imprecise probabilities.

Inertial Updating

Belief measures conditioned on random set

Belief Bias Identification

Belief Update as Social Choice

The Wasserstein Believer: Learning Belief Updates for Partially Observable Environments through Reliable Latent Space Models

Conservative Updating

A New Approach to Updating Beliefs

Further perceptions of probability: Accurate, stepwise updating is contingent on prior information about the task and the response mode

Judicious Judgment Meets Unsettling Updating: Dilation, Sure Loss, and Simpson's Paradox

Justifying the Norms of Inductive Inference

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Understanding Impression Updating Through Behavior Predictions

Updating information based on generalized credal sets. Part 1: Finite case

An Investigation of Darwiche and Pearl's Postulates for Iterated Belief Update

Modular Belief Updates and Confusion about Measures of Certainty in Artificial Intelligence Research

Retractions: Updating from Complex Information

Model updating after interventions paradoxically introduces bias

Inertia In Strategy Switching Transforms The Strategy Evolution

Non-Bayesian Persuasion

Free Entropy Minimizing Persuasion in a Predictor-Corrector Dynamic

Belief Updating by Enumerating High-Probability Independence-Based Assignments