Association between psychological traits and occlusal tactile acuity of healthy individuals

Gabriella Coppola,Ambrosina Michelotti,Vittorio Simeon,Michail Koutris,Frank Lobbezoo,Rosaria Bucci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13828
2024-09-02
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Abstract:Can a subject's psychological background influence their occlusal perceptual tactile ability? Five psychological traits, assessed through self‐completion questionnaires, were studied in relation to the subject's ability to detect thicknesses between teeth in maximum intercuspation. This was analysed using ANOVA statistical analysis. Individuals with moderate and severe anxiety symptoms, as well as those with severe catastrophizing levels, have reduced perception of small thicknesses between the antagonist teeth during maximum intercuspation. Objectives Tactile acuity is a somatosensory measure of the extent to which humans can discern tactile stimuli. It is influenced by how peripheral signals are processed centrally. In the oral cavity, Occlusal Tactile Acuity (OTA) is the ability to perceive minimal thicknesses between antagonist teeth. The aim of the current study was to assess the association between psychological traits and OTA of otherwise healthy individuals. Methods Sixty‐three volunteers (32 males; mean age ± SD: 24.6 ± 2.7 years) participated in this study. Somatosensory amplification, anxiety, depression, physical symptoms and pain catastrophizing were scored using questionnaires, and subgroups of severity were created per variable based on cut‐offs. OTA was measured using 9 aluminium foils with thickness (ranging from 8 to 72 μm) and one sham test (without foil). Each thickness was tested 10 times in random order, the participants were instructed to report whether they felt the foil between their molars and the mean percentage of correct answers was computed. A linear mixed model was used with OTA as a dependent variable and psychological domain as an independent variable. Results Significantly different OTA was observed among the anxiety subgroups (p = .003), supporting a decreased perception of thicknesses 24 and 32 μm (p = .018 and p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?