Abstract:Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis of level I and II evidence comparing different management techniques to define the optimum treatment method for humeral shaft fractures (HSFs). Data sources: A systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was screened from 2010 to 2023. Study selection: Inclusion criteria were evidence level I or II studies comparing nonoperative and/or operative repair techniques including open reduction internal fixation plate osteosynthesis (ORIF-Plate), minimally invasive percutaneous plating (MIPO), and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for the management of HSFs (OTA/AO 12A, B, C). Data extraction: The risk of bias and methodologic quality of evidence were assessed according to the guidelines designed by the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and Cochrane Methods Bias Group. Data synthesis: Network meta-analysis was conducted with a frequentist approach with a random-effects model using the netmeta package version 0.9-6 in R. Results: A total of 25 studies (1908 patients) were included. MIPO resulted in the lowest complication rate (2.1%) when compared with ORIF-Plate (16.1%) [odds ratio (OR), 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.49]. MIPO resulted in the lowest nonunion rate (0.65%) compared with all management techniques (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.98), whereas Non-Op resulted in the highest (15.87%) (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.98-6.11). MIPO demonstrated the lowest rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy overall (2.2%) and demonstrated a significantly lower rate compared with ORIF-Plate (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.71, P = 0.02). IMN resulted in the lowest rate of deep infection (1.1%) when compared with ORIF-Plate (8.6%; P = 0.013). MIPO resulted in a significantly lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (3.86 ± 5.2) and higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (98.2 ± 1.4) than ORIF-Plate (19.5 ± 9.0 and 60.0 ± 5.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results from this study support that surgical management results in better postoperative functional outcomes, leads to higher union rates, reduces fracture healing time, reduces revision rate, and decreases malunion rates in patients with HSFs. In addition, MIPO resulted in statistically higher union rates, lowest complication rate, lowest rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy, and lower intraoperative time while resulting in better postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores when compared with nonoperative and operative (ORIF and IMN) treatment modalities. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correlation between Peripheric Blood Markers and Surgical Invasiveness during Humeral Shaft Fracture Osteosynthesis in Young and Middle-Aged Patients

Sterile Inflammatory Response and Surgery-Related Trauma in Elderly Patients with Subtrochanteric Fractures

Management of Humeral Shaft Fracture: A Network Metanalysis of Individual Treatment Modalities

Management of Humeral Shaft Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Individual Treatment Modalities

Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw Internal Fixation on Serum Markers in Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures

Short-term complication rates of open reduction and plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a propensity score matched analysis

Effects of different surgical techniques on mid-distal humeral shaft vascularity: open reduction and internal fixation versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis

Association between surgical delays for femoral neck fractures and early postoperative complications in young and middle-aged adults: A study based on the national inpatient sample database

No Differences in Clinical, Functional, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Trial of Non-operative Management Prior to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures.

No Differences in Clinical, Functional, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Trial of Nonoperative Management Before Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures

Assessment of Surgical Management for Locked Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Humerus in Patients of Different Ages

A retrospective analysis of functional and radiographic outcomes of humeral shaft fractures treated operatively versus nonoperatively

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Study

An Updated Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgery-Related Factors

Influence of Timing on Surgical Outcomes for Acute Humeral Shaft Fractures

Deltoid tuberosity index for proximal humerus fracture: reliability and a predictor of systemic osteoporosis in an Asian population

Efficacies of Surgical Treatments Based on Harris Hip Score in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture.

MELD score predicts short-term outcomes after surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: a matched analysis

Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type

Preoperative inflammatory biomarkers reveal renal involvement in postsurgical mortality in hip fracture patients: an exploratory study

Effect of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis on humeral shaft fractures