A Study on Generative Design Reasoning and Students' Divergent and Convergent Thinking

Alex Brown,Molly H. Goldstein,John Clay,H. Onan Demirel,Xingang Li,Zhenghui Sha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064564

2024-02-08

Journal of Mechanical Design

Abstract:Abstract Computer-aided design (CAD) is a standard design tool used in engineering practice and by students. CAD has become increasingly analytic and inventive in incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to design, e.g., generative design (GD), to help expand designers' divergent thinking. However, generative design technologies are relatively new, we know little about generative design thinking in students. This research aims to advance our understanding of the relationship between aspects of generative design thinking and traditional design thinking. This study was set in an introductory graphics and design course where student designers used Fusion 360 to optimize a bicycle wheel frame. We collected the following data from the sample: divergent and convergent psychological tests and an open-ended response to a generative design prompt (called the generative design reasoning elicitation problem). A Spearman's rank correlation showed no statistically significant relationship between generative design reasoning and divergent thinking. However, an analysis of variance found a significant difference in generative design reasoning and convergent thinking between groups with moderate GD reasoning and low GD reasoning. This study shows that new computational tools might present the same challenges to beginning designers as conventional tools. Instructors should be aware of informed design practices and encourage students to grow into informed designers by introducing them to new technology, such as generative design.

engineering, mechanical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is understanding the relationship between generative design thinking and traditional design thinking, particularly the relationship between generative design reasoning and divergent and convergent thinking. The study aims to explore the impact of these new tools on students' design thinking by analyzing their performance when using generative design tools.

Specifically:
1. **Research Background**: With the development of computer-aided design (CAD) technology, especially the introduction of generative design technology, these new technologies have impacted students' creative thinking and design abilities. However, there is currently limited research on how students adapt to and utilize these technologies.
2. **Research Objectives**: To understand the relationship between generative design thinking and traditional design thinking, particularly the relationship between generative design reasoning and divergent and convergent thinking.
3. **Research Methods**: Data was collected in an engineering graphics and design course, including divergent thinking tests, convergent thinking tests, and open-ended questions on generative design reasoning. Researchers used Spearman rank correlation analysis and variance analysis to explore the relationships between these variables.
4. **Research Findings**: Although there was no statistically significant correlation between generative design reasoning and divergent thinking, there were significant differences between different levels of generative design reasoning and convergent thinking. This suggests that new computational tools may present the same design challenges to beginners as traditional tools.

In summary, this study aims to reveal the specific impact of generative design technology on students' design thinking and provides guidance for educators to better integrate these new technologies into teaching.