Abstract:With the growth in the use of health economic evaluation to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions, the challenges in applying standard methods to child health have become apparent. A unique limitation is the paucity of child-specific preference-based measures. A single, valid, preference-based measure of utility that can be used in children of all ages does not exist. Thus, the ability to derive a QALY for use in cost-utility analysis (CUA) is compromised. This paper presents and discusses existing and novel options for deriving utilities for paediatric health states for use in CUAs. While a direct elicitation may be preferred, a child's ability to complete a standard gamble or time trade-off task is hampered by cognitive and age limitations. The abstract notions contained in indirect instruments such as the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index may also pose challenges for young children. Novel approaches to overcome these challenges include the development of age-appropriate instruments such as the EQ-5D-Y, the development of new child-specific utility instruments such as the Child Health Utility-9D and the re-calibration of existing adult instruments to derive preference weights for health states from children themselves. For children aged <6 years, researchers have little choice but to use a proxy reporter such as parents. While parents may be reliable reporters for physical activity limitations and externally manifest symptoms, their ability to accurately report on subjective outcomes such as emotion is questionable. Catalogues of utility weights for a range of conditions are increasingly becoming available but retain many of the same limitations as valuing health states from children or from proxies. Given the dynamic relationship in quality of life (QOL) between family members when a child is ill, it seems appropriate to consider a 'family perspective' rather than an individual perspective in child health state valuation. In a collective approach, health state utilities derived from multiple family members may be combined mathematically. Alternatively, in a unitary approach, a single utility estimate may be determined to represent the family's perspective. This may include deriving utilities through parent-child dyad estimation or by using a household model that combines the utility weights of the patient and family members, incorporating reciprocal QOL effects. While these various approaches to child health state valuation represent novel research developments, the measurement challenges and threats to validity persist. Given the importance of non-health benefits to child health, especially in the domains of education and public policy, it may be worthwhile to consider an approach that allows incorporation of externalities to produce a cost-benefit analysis. The use of discrete-choice methods to assess willingness to pay for novel child health interventions holds promise as a means to produce meaningful economic evidence. Regardless of the approach taken, the highest degree of methodological rigour is essential. The increasing attention being paid by health economic researchers to the measurement challenges of paediatric health state valuation can only increase the value of child health economic evidence for decision making.

Understanding Canadian stakeholders' views on measuring and valuing health for children and adolescents: a qualitative study

Stakeholder-Engaged Derivation of Patient-Informed Value Elements

Public deliberation on health gain measures

Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health

How do common conditions impact health-related quality of life for children? Providing guidance for validating pediatric preference-based measures

Assessing the Value of Provider-Facing Digital Health Technologies Used in Chronic Disease Management: Toward a Value Framework Based on Multistakeholder Perceptions

Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?

Development of a Value Assessment Framework for Pediatric Health Technologies Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Expanding the Value Lens for Funding Decision Making

Payer perceptions and use of value assessment tools in the United States

Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life among Children and Adolescents in Mainland China - A Pilot Study

Incorporating public and wider stakeholder views in the design of health state valuation studies in adults and young people: an undervalued resource?

Stakeholder views of services for children and adolescents with obesity: Mega-ethnography of qualitative syntheses

Parent Perspectives on Electronic Health Record-Based Social Needs Screening and Documentation: A Qualitative Study

Equity in public health standards: a qualitative document analysis of policies from two Canadian provinces

A Value Framework to Assess Patient-Facing Digital Health Technologies That Aim to Improve Chronic Disease Management: A Delphi Approach

Patient experience surveys for children’s community health services: A scoping review

Health-Related Quality of Life in Relation to Health Behaviour Patterns among Canadian Children

Insights from Multiple Stakeholders Regarding Adolescent Obesity in China: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England

Valuing Children: Parents' Perceptions, Spending Priorities and Children's Capabilities

Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia