Enhancing Cognitive Control with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Subject-Specific Frontoparietal Networks

Julia Dengler,Benjamin Deck,Harrison Stoll,Guadalupe Fernandez-Nunez,Apoorva S. Kelkar,Ryan Rich,Brian A. Erickson,Fareshte Erani,Olufunsho Faseyitan,Roy H. Hamilton,John D. Medaglia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.11.020
IF: 4.644
2024-01-21
Cortex
Abstract:Background Cognitive control processes, including those involving frontoparietal networks, are highly variable between individuals, posing challenges to basic and clinical sciences. While distinct frontoparietal networks have been associated with specific cognitive control functions such as switching, inhibition, and working memory updating functions, there have been few basic tests of the role of these networks at the individual level. Methods To examine the role of cognitive control at the individual level, we conducted a within-subject excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study in 19 healthy individuals that targeted intrinsic ("resting") frontoparietal networks. Person-specific intrinsic networks were identified with resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans to determine TMS targets. The participants performed three cognitive control tasks: an adapted Navon figure-ground task (requiring set switching), n-back (working memory), and Stroop color-word (inhibition). Objective /Hypothesis: We predicted that stimulating a network associated with externally oriented control (the "FPCN-B") would improve performance on the set switching and working memory task relative to a network associated with attention (the Dorsal Attention Network, DAN) and cranial vertex in a full within-subjects crossover design. Results We found that set switching performance was enhanced by FPCN-B stimulation along with some evidence of enhancement in the higher-demand n-back conditions. Conclusion Higher task demands or proactive control might be a distinguishing role of the FPCN-B, and personalized intrinsic network targeting is feasible in TMS designs.
behavioral sciences,psychology, experimental,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?