Abstract:Differential and linear cryptanalysis are two important methods to evaluate the security of block ciphers. Building on these two methods, differential‐linear (DL) cryptanalysis was introduced by Langford and Hellman in 1994. This cryptanalytic method has been not only extensively researched but also proven to be effective. In this paper, a security evaluation framework for AND‐RX ciphers against DL cryptanalysis is proposed, which is denoted as K6. In addition to modeling the structure of all the possible differential trails and linear trails at the bit level, we introduce a method to calculate this structure round by round. Based on this approach, an automatic algorithm is proposed to construct the DL distinguisher. Unlike previous methods, K6 uses a truncated differential and a linear hull instead of a differential characteristic and a linear approximation, which brings the bias of the DL distinguisher close to the experimental value. To validate the effectiveness of the framework, K6 is applied to Simon and Simeck, which are two typical AND‐RX ciphers. With the automatic algorithm, we discover an 11‐round DL distinguisher of Simon32 with bias 2−14.89 and a 12‐round DL distinguisher of Simeck32 with bias 2−14.89. Moreover, the 14‐round DL distinguisher of Simon48 with bias 2−22.30 is longer than the longest DL distinguisher currently known. In addition, the framework K6 shows advantages when analyzing ciphers with large block sizes. As far as we know, for Simon64/96/128 and Simeck48/64, the first DL distinguishers are obtained with our framework. The DL distinguishers are 16, 23, 32, 17, and 22 rounds of Simon64/96/128 and Simeck48/64 with bias 2−24.31, 2−47.57, 2−60.75, 2−22.54, and 2−31.41, respectively. To prove the correctness of distinguishers, experiments on Simon32 and Simeck32 have been performed. The experimental bias are 2−13.76 and 2−14.82, respectively. Comparisons of the theoretical and experimental results show good agreement.

SAT-Based Automatic Searching for Differential and Linear Trails: Applying to CRAX

Automatic Search of Linear Trails in ARX with Applications to SPECK and Chaskey.

Towards non-independence of modular additions in searching differential trails of ARX ciphers: new automatic methods with application to SPECK and Chaskey

AlgSAT—A SAT Method for Verification of Differential Trails from an Algebraic Perspective

New Automatic Tool for Finding Impossible Differentials and Zero-Correlation Linear Approximations

Speeding Up The Search Algorithm For The Best Differential And Best Linear Trails

An Improved Automatic Search Method for Differential Trails in TEA Cipher.

Rotational-XOR Differential Cryptanalysis and an Automatic Framework for AND-RX Ciphers

Differential-Linear Approximation Semi-unconstrained Searching and Partition Tree: Application to LEA and Speck

Automatic Search for Related-Key Differential Trails in SIMON-like Block Ciphers Based on MILP

Automated Search Oriented To Key Recovery On Ciphers With Linear Key Schedule Applications To Boomerangs In Skinny And Forkskinny

Automated Search Oriented to Key Recovery on Ciphers with Linear Key Schedule

Linear cryptanalysis of SPECK and SPARX

New linear approximation of modular addition and improved differential-linear cryptanalysis of SPARX-64/128

Automated Differential‐Linear Cryptanalysis for AND‐RX Ciphers

Truncated Differential Attacks on Symmetric Primitives with Linear Key Schedule: WARP and Orthros

Automatic Search of Differential Characteristics and Improved Differential Cryptanalysis for PRINCE, QARMA, and MANTIS

Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis from an Algebraic Perspective

Enhanced Differential Cache Attacks on SM4 with Algebraic Analysis and Error-Tolerance

Optimised the Differential Trail of the Authenticated Encryption Algorithm Tiaoxin-346

Rotational-Linear Attack: A New Framework of Cryptanalysis on ARX Ciphers with Applications to Chaskey