Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants

Aziz Belkadi,Alexandre Bolze,Yuval Itan,Aurélie Cobat,Quentin B Vincent,Alexander Antipenko,Lei Shang,Bertrand Boisson,Jean-Laurent Casanova,Laurent Abel,Quentin B. Vincent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418631112
IF: 11.1
2015-03-31
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is gradually being optimized to identify mutations in increasing proportions of the protein-coding exome, but whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming an attractive alternative. WGS is currently more expensive than WES, but its cost should decrease more rapidly than that of WES. We compared WES and WGS on six unrelated individuals. The distribution of quality parameters for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels) was more uniform for WGS than for WES. The vast majority of SNVs and indels were identified by both techniques, but an estimated 650 high-quality coding SNVs (∼3% of coding variants) were detected by WGS and missed by WES. WGS is therefore slightly more efficient than WES for detecting mutations in the targeted exome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?