Analysis of timing delay

Koki Kudo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5432/JJPEHSS.KJ00003392146
Abstract:The present study investigated the timing delay found in the performance of coincident timmg task, Former studies referring to constant error (CE) in coincident timing responses have indicated several results in common. E$pecially prominent ones among them are as follows: (1) when the tasks required of the subjects are a gross motor activity, delays are dominant in their coincident timing responses, and (2) the tendency toward delay increases in proportion to the increase in the rnagnitude of motor response andtor the speed of moving stirnulus. Three experiments were conducted in this study so as to reexamine those findings in former studies and then to clarify the reason why delays were dominant in gross motor responses. The task assigtied to the subjects in the first experiment was to synchronize the landing of a sideward jump on the right foot with the arrival of moving target at the timing point. The effect of the speed of the traget on timing error was examined. The results indicated that, regardless of the difference in the speed of the moving target, almost all the subjects showed obvious delays in their coincident timing responses. It was also suggested that, though the difference in the speed of the target produced no significant effect on CE, the subjects tended to change and adjust their response movement to correspond to the specific speed of the target. Thus, the findings in former studies were partly supported by this experirnent. In the second experiment, the source of the delays in timing responses was analyzed. The timing error was presumed to be attributable to two components: one was the stimulus anticipation error (SAE), the error which was produced in the anticipation of the time when the moving target would arrive at the timing point, and the other was the rnovement anticipation error (MAE), the error which was produced in the estimation of the duration in which each subject would complete his movement. ()n the basis of this premise, an attempt was made in this experiment to separate the timing error into two components. The result indicated that underestimation was clearly found in MAE whereas there was no specific tendency in SAE. It was inferred from this finding that the delays in timing responses might be caused by the underestimation of the duration needed for the response movement of the subjects. The result of the second experiment brought forth the hypothesis that, when SAE was held 1 Fuhttshima UhitAersdy, Iilictcity of Ed#cution, Mbtsuhawa-cho, Fle,kushimaa'ty. Fleflezashima re60-12i
Psychology,Computer Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?