Predictors of improvement in community adolescents with chronic neck pain: A secondary analysis using different improvement criteria

Rosa Andias,Mário Rodrigues,Anabela G. Silva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13131
2024-02-29
PM&R
Abstract:Background Interventions based on pain neuroscience education and exercise have emerged as effective in the management of chronic neck pain in adolescents. No studies have explored factors that might be associated with recovery in adolescents with neck pain. Objective To explore predictors of improvement after an intervention based on exercise and pain neuroscience education. Design Secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Setting Community. Participants 127 community adolescents with neck pain. Interventions Blended‐learning intervention based on exercise and pain neuroscience education. Main Outcome Measures A set of variables including sociodemographic data, pain characteristics, physical activity, disability, sleep, catastrophizing, fear of movement, self‐efficacy, symptoms of central sensitization, knowledge of pain neuroscience, pressure pain thresholds, and neck muscles endurance were used to predict a clinical response at 1 week after intervention and at 6‐month follow‐up. Results Different predictors of improvement and non‐improvement to intervention were found, but common predictors were not found for all the improvement criteria explored and time points. Conclusions These findings suggest that using different criteria to characterize adolescents with neck pain as improved and non‐improved after pain neuroscience education and exercise have an effect on the variables associated with a response to the intervention.
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?