Unilateral versus bilateral lateral rectus recession for correction of small to moderate angle exotropia

Rehab Rashad Kassem,Rokaya Emad Radwan,Randa Mohamed Abdel-Moneim El-Mofty,Hala Mostafa Elhilali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03324-1

IF: 2.029

2024-10-18

International Ophthalmology

Abstract:To compare the effect of unilateral versus bilateral lateral rectus (LR) recession for correction of small to moderate exotropia.

ophthalmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession/resection for basic intermittent exotropia

Oscar Oliva,Álvaro Morgado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2018.06.7318

2018-10-29

Medwave

Abstract:Introduction: Intermittent exotropia requires surgical resolution under some clinical circumstances. The main techniques are bilateral lateral rectus recession and unilateral recess/resection. Although bilateral recession is the most widely used, it is not clear whether it leads to better results. Methods: To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified five systematic reviews including seven studies overall, of which three were randomized trials. We concluded unilateral recess/resection might achieve greater surgical success and probably decrease the rate of undercorrection/recurrence when compared to bilateral lateral rectus recession.
Unilateral lateral rectus recession is an effective surgery for intermittent exotropia in young children

Oriel Spierer,Abraham Spierer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01778-2

2021-01-06

Abstract:Background: Different surgical methods have been suggested for the correction of intermittent exotropia. Unilateral lateral rectus recession has been described as a surgical alternative for small and moderate-angle exotropia. In general, previous studies did not focus on the outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession in young children with intermittent exotropia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession in the treatment of moderate-angle exotropia (≤ 25 PD (prism diopters)) in children. Methods: The charts of all patients younger than 12 years of age with moderate-angle exotropia (up to 25 PD) who were operated during the years 2006-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-eight patients underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession and had a minimum follow up of 6 months. The angle of exotropia (PD) before and after surgery and the success rate were documented. Results: Mean age at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.9 (range 3.5-11.0) years. Exotropia improved from a preoperative angle of 21.4 ± 4.0 PD to 3.5 ± 5.9 PD postoperatively (p < 0.001). Success rate, defined as deviation of ≤ 10 PD, was achieved in 86.2%. There were 2 (3.4%) cases of overcorrection (consecutive esotropia). There were no intra- or postoperative complications. The mean follow-up duration after surgery was 2.3 ± 1.7 years. Conclusions: In children with moderate angle exotropia, good postoperative success rate was achieved by performing unilateral lateral rectus recession.
Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes Between Unilateral Recession and Unilateral Recession-Resection in Small-Angle Exotropia

Hyuna Kim,Hee Kyung Yang,Jeong-Min Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.047

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection (RR) and unilateral lateral rectus recession (ULR) for intermittent exotropia of ≤20 prism diopters (PD). Design: Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study. Methods: A total of 130 children with intermittent exotropia of ≤20 PD who underwent unilateral RR or ULR of 10 mm were included. Patients were observed for at least 2 years. Success rates, cumulative probabilities of success, and factors related to recurrence and overcorrection were evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up duration after surgery was 3.1 ± 1.0 years in the RR group and 3.6 ± 1.6 years in the ULR group. In the RR group, 38 of 61 patients (62%) had ocular alignment within 10 PD of exophoria/tropia and 5 PD of esophoria/tropia; 18 patients (30%) had recurrence, and 5 (8%) had overcorrection. In the ULR group, 26 of 69 patients (38%) had successful alignment, 41 patients (59%) had recurrence, and 2 patients (3%) were overcorrected. At 6 months after surgery, the success rate was significantly higher in the ULR group (RR 61%; ULR 78%, P = .039), but it became comparable after 2 years (RR 60%; ULR 52%, P = .370). At the final examination after a mean duration of 3 years, the recurrence rates were lower in the RR group (30% vs 59%, P = .001), and the overcorrection rates were comparable (8% vs 3%, P = .252). Conclusion: Unilateral RR resulted in more successful alignment and lower recurrence compared to ULR for the treatment of small-angle intermittent exotropia of ≤20 PD.
Comparison of lateral rectus muscle re-recession and medial rectus muscle resection for treatment of postoperative exotropia

Gregg T Lueder,Marlo Galli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.020

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus muscle re-recession and medial rectus muscle resection for treatment of recurrent or persistent exotropia. Design: Retrospective nonrandomized clinical trial. Methods: setting: Hospital-based clinical practice. Patient population: Forty patients with recurrent or persistent exotropia following bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions. Intervention: Fourteen patients were treated with unilateral medial rectus muscle resection and 26 with unilateral lateral rectus muscle re-recession. Main outcome measures: Outcomes were considered successful if the patients had deviations less than 10 prism diopters (PD) at last follow-up. All patients were followed for at least 1 year postoperatively. Results: The mean preoperative deviations were 17.4 PD in the medial rectus muscle resection group and 18.1 PD in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group. Successful outcomes were achieved in 9 of 14 patients (64%) treated with medial rectus muscle resection and 19 of 26 patients (73%) treated with lateral rectus muscle re-recession. There was no statistically significant difference between these outcomes. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years in the medial rectus muscle resection group and 2.9 years in the lateral rectus muscle re-recession group. Conclusions: Surgery on a single muscle can be used to treat moderate-angle recurrent or persistent exotropia. Unilateral re-recession of the lateral rectus muscle and medial rectus muscle resection have equivalent success rates.
Comparison of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession for Small Angle Intermittent Exotropia: Outcomes and Surgical Dose-Responses

Ming-Han Hugo Lee,David R Smith,Stephen P Kraft,Michael J Wan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20220131-03

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession to bilateral lateral rectus recession for small angle intermittent exotropia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with an intermittent exotropia between 16 and 20 prism diopters (PD) who underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession or bilateral lateral rectus recession at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. The primary outcome was success (exotropia < 10 PD of esotropia < 5 PD, no decrease in stereopsis > 0.6 log arcsec, and no reoperation) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included survival analysis of time to surgical failure, surgical dose-response, and improvement in central fusion or stereopsis. Results: At 12 months, successful outcomes were achieved in 13 of 27 patients (46%) in the bilateral lateral rectus recession group and 19 of 28 patients (70%) in the unilateral lateral rectus recession group, which was not a statistically significant difference (P = .10). Survival analysis showed a trend toward a higher rate of failure in the bilateral lateral rectus recession group compared to the unilateral lateral rectus recession group (P = .04). The mean surgical dose-response was 1.7 PD/mm at 1 week and 1.0 PD/mm at 12 months for the bilateral lateral rectus recession group, and 2.0 PD/mm at 1 week postoperatively and 1.4 PD/mm at 12 months postoperatively for the unilateral lateral rectus recession group. There were no cases of long-term postoperative lateral incomitance in either group. Conclusions: Unilateral lateral rectus recession and bilateral lateral rectus recession have similar success rates for small angle intermittent exotropia after at least 12 months of follow-up. Randomized controlled trials in surgical management of intermittent exotropia should consider unilateral lateral rectus recession as a treatment arm. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(5):350-355.].
Bilateral Medial Rectus Advancement versus Unilateral Medial Rectus Advancement with Lateral Rectus Recession for Surgical Management of Large Angle Consecutive Exotropia without Adduction Deficit

Sahar Torky Abdelrazik Abdelaziz,Mohamed Farag Khalil Ibrahiem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S377522

2022-08-16

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the postoperative eye alignment in patients who underwent bilateral medial rectus advancement with those who underwent unilateral medial rectus advancement plus ipsilateral lateral rectus recession in the case of large angle consecutive exotropia without adduction deficit. Methods: Thirty-four patients with large angle consecutive exotropia that developed after infantile esotropia surgery were included in this retrospective study. Nineteen patients underwent bilateral medial rectus muscle advancement (group I) and 15 underwent unilateral medial rectus muscle advancement with ipsilateral lateral rectus muscle recession (group II). The follow-up periods were at least 12 months. Postoperative eye alignment was assessed and orthotropia within 10 prism diopters was considered a successful result. Results: The mean age of patients was 9.45±2.71 years in group I and 9.93±2.05 years in group II. Sixty percent of patients were female in group II and 57.89% in group I. In group I, the mean preoperative angle of deviation was 56.26±3.78 PD at distance and 53.11±3.49 PD at near. In group II, patients had a mean preoperative angle of deviation of 56±3.38 and 52.47±2.77 PD at distance and near, respectively. At the end of the follow-up period, the success rate was 52.63% in group I and 73.33% in group II (p = 0.22). The mean of the dose-effect relationship in group I was 2.62±1.35 PD/mm while in group II it was 2.36±0.84 PD/mm (p = 0.52). Conclusion: In patients with large angle consecutive exotropia, unilateral medial rectus advancement combined with ipsilateral lateral rectus recession produced better postoperative eye alignment than bilateral medial rectus advancement. Group I had a higher dose-effect relationship than group II.
Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia

Young Bok Lee,Dong Gyu Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0512-5

2017-07-05

Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to compare the primary surgery and reoperation outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (R&R) for intermittent exotropia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients, all of whom had undergone unilateral R&R for intermittent exotropia as a primary surgery or reoperation and been followed-up on postoperatively for 6 months or more. The patients were divided into two groups: unilateral R&R as primary surgery (group A, 44 patients) and unilateral R&R as reoperation (group B, 36 patients). The outcome measures were postoperative angle of deviation, surgical success rate, and mean dose-effect ratio (PD/mm, corrected angle of deviation / sum of amount of recession of lateral rectus and of resection of medial rectus). Surgical success was defined as exo- or esodeviation within 8 PD. Results: The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 49.91 ± 14.83 months in group A and 43.17 ± 26.91 months in group B (p = 0.160). The mean angles of deviation at postoperative 1 day were -5.18 PD (overcorrection) in group A and -5.28 PD in group B (p = 0.932). However, there was a significant difference in the mean angle of deviation between the two groups at each visit from postoperative 3 months to final follow-up (p < 0.05): in short, group A had become more exotropic than group B. And the surgical success rate was higher in group B than in group A at each visit from postoperative 12 months to final follow-up (47.7% in group A and 83.3% in group B at final follow-up) (p < 0.05). The mean dose-effect ratio at 6 months after surgery was 1.89 ± 0.58 PD/mm in group A and 2.26 ± 0.32 PD/mm in group B (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Unilateral R&R as reoperation presented better results for the surgical treatment of recurrent exotropia, showing a smaller exodrift pattern and higher surgical success rates compared with R&R as a primary surgery. The mean effect per millimeter (the mean dose-effect ratio, PD/mm) of R&R as reoperation was significantly greater than that of R&R as primary surgery at postoperative 6 months. These results could serve as useful guidelines in the planning of surgical correction for primary and recurrent exotropia.
Comparison of surgical outcomes between bilateral recession and unilateral recession-resection in moderate-angle intermittent exotropia

Fang Xie,Kanxing Zhao,Wei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.11.007

Abstract:Purpose: To compare postoperative drift after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) and after unilateral recession combined with medial rectus resection (R&R) in children with primary moderate-angle intermittent exotropia. Methods: The medical records of children with intermittent exotropia in the range of 25Δ-50Δ who underwent BLR or R&R from July 2015 to September 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes were classified according to postoperative angle of deviation at distance as overcorrection (esophoria or -tropia of >5Δ), success (esophoria or -tropia of ≤5Δ to exophoria/tropia of ≤10Δ), or recurrence (exophoria or -tropia of >10Δ). Patients were examined on postoperative day 1 and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Sensory status was evaluated using the Titmus stereoacuity test. Results: A total of 330 children were included (BLR, 175; R&R, 155). Exotropic drift was greater in the R&R group in the period between day 1 and 6 weeks and from 6 to 12 months (P <0.05). Surgical successful rates in each group were comparable: 57.7% in the BLR group and 60.6% in the R&R group (P > 0.05). However, higher overcorrection rates were noted in the BLR group at 6 and 12 months (16.6% vs 6.5 % at 12 months [P = 0.003]). There were more patients with deteriorated stereopsis after surgery in the BLR group (P = 0.025). Conclusions: In our study cohort, BLR was associated with more stable long-term ocular alignment and a higher rate of overcorrection than R&R. Postoperative day 1 overcorrection of <16Δ following R&R and of <10Δ following BLR were associated with relatively good results.
Bilateral vs unilateral medial rectus resection for recurrent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus recession

Hee Kyung Yang,Jeong-Min Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.017

Abstract:Purpose: To compare outcomes after bilateral and unilateral medial rectus (BMR/UMR) resection for the treatment of recurrent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) muscle recession. Design: Retrospective, cohort study. Methods: Forty-four patients underwent BMR resection (BMR group) or UMR resection (UMR group) for recurrent constant exotropia of 25 prism diopters (PD) or less at distance after undergoing BLR muscle recession for intermittent exotropia in an institutional setting. The main outcome measures were final success rates and improvement in stereopsis and were compared between the groups. The risk factors for recurrence after reoperation also were evaluated. Secondary outcome measures were evaluated based on the drift of ocular alignment toward exodeviation after surgery (exodrift) from postoperative day 1. Results: Thirteen (54%) of 24 patients in the BMR group had successful outcomes, 10 (42%) had overcorrection, and 1 (4%) had undercorrection at the last follow-up examination. Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients in the UMR group had successful outcomes, 2 (10%) had undercorrection, and 2 (10%) had overcorrection. The incidence of successful outcomes at the last follow-up examination and the incidence of recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups, whereas the incidence of overcorrection was significantly higher in the BMR group (P = .017). Conclusions: Large UMR resection is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of small to moderate angles of recurrent exotropia after BLR muscle recession. The overcorrection rate was significantly lower after UMR resection than it was after BMR resection.
Predictive Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcome of Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession

Hee Kyung Yang,Mi-Jin Kim,Jeong-Min Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137687

IF: 3.7

2015-09-29

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: There are few long-term outcome reports of unilateral lateral rectus (LR) recession for exotropia including a large number of subjects. Previous reports on unilateral LR recession commonly show extremely low rates of initial overcorrection and large exodrifts after surgery suggesting that the surgical dose may be increased. However, little is known of the long-term outcome of a large unilateral LR recession for exotropia. Objectives: To determine long-term outcomes and predictive factors of recurrence after a large unilateral LR recession in patients with exotropia. Data extraction: Retrospective analysis was performed on 92 patients aged 3 to 17 years who underwent 10 mm unilateral LR recession for exotropia of ≤ 25 prism diopters (Δ) with prism and alternate cover testing and were followed up for more than 2 years after surgery. Final success rates within 10Δ of exophoria/tropia and 5Δ of esophoria/tropia at distance in the primary position, improvement in stereopsis and the predictive factors for recurrence were evaluated. Results: At 24 months after surgery, 54% of patients had ocular alignment meeting the defined criteria of success, 45% had recurrence and 1% had overcorrection. After a mean follow-up of 39 months, 36% showed success, 63% showed recurrence and 1% resulted in overcorrection. The average time of recurrence was 23.4±14.7 months (range, 1-60 months) and the rate of recurrence per person-year was 23% after unilateral LR recession. Predictive factors of recurrence were a larger preoperative near angle of deviation (>16Δ) and larger initial postoperative exodeviation (>5Δ) at distance. Conclusions: Long-term outcome of unilateral LR recession for exotropia showed low success rates with high recurrence, thus should be reserved for patients with a small preoperative near angle of exodeviation.
Botulinum toxin augmented bilateral lateral rectus recession versus three muscles surgery in large-angle intermittent exotropia

Hala Kamal Mattout,Sameh Mosaad Fouda,Wael M El-Haig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.10.15

2022-10-18

Abstract:Aim: To report the surgical outcomes of correcting large angle intermittent exotropia in adult patients by bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession with intraoperative use of botulinum toxin and to compare the results with those of bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession and unilateral medial rectus resection. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent surgical correction of large angle intermittent exotropia [exotropia >50 prism dioptre (PD)] were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups of patients were identified; Group I (21 patients) had bilateral lateral recti recession augmented with intraoperative botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection into the recessed muscles and group II (30 patients) were treated by bilateral lateral recti recession with unilateral medial rectus muscle resection. Preoperative data were extracted for age, gender, refraction, type of exotropia, angle of stereopsis and angle of deviation. The main outcome measures were the postoperative angle of deviation and stereoacuity angle by Titmus test measured at the end of one year of postoperative follow up. Results: By the end of the first postoperative year, 10 patients in group I (47.6%) and 20 patients in group II (66.7%) achieved esotropia/esophoria <5 PD or exotropia/exophoria <10 PD. The difference in surgical success rate was not statistically significant (P=0.1) but there was a statistically significant higher rate of undercorrection in group I (P=0.03). On the other hand, 3 patients in group I (14.3%) and 5 patients in group II (16.7%) had improved stereopsis; this difference in the sensory outcome was not statistically significant (P=0.8). In the BTA augmented surgery group, good stereoacuity and smaller preoperative angle of deviation were associated with significantly higher surgical success rate (P=0.004, 0.01 respectively). Conclusion: BTA augmented bilateral lateral recti recession is associated with higher rate of undercorrection as compared to bilateral lateral recti recession with unilateral medial rectus resection in the correction of large angle intermittent exotropia. The surgical success rate in BTA augmented surgery group is observed to be higher in patients with preoperative smaller angle of deviation and in patients with good stereoacuity.
[How to understand the excessive lateral rectus muscle recession]

Xiaoli Kang,Yan Wei

Abstract:Surgical treatments of intermittent exotropia include symmetric bilateral lateral rectus recession, symmetric bilateral medial rectus resection, asymmetric monocular lateral rectus recession and/or medial rectus resection, in which lateral rectus recession is the most common method. The maximum amount of lateral rectus recession, however, is still controversial. Bilateral lateral rectus recession 7-8 mm for 35(Δ)-40(Δ) exotropia and unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection for exotropia larger than 40(Δ) are suggested by most doctor usually. But some other doctors advocated augmented bilateral lateral rectus recession (9-14 mm ) for exotropia larger than 50(Δ) or augmented unilateral lateral rectus recession for moderate angle exotropia (30(Δ)-35(Δ)), which brought confusion in practical clinical work. In this paper, we'll focus on the amount of lateral rectus recession, and discuss several common issues related to augmented lateral rectus recession, in order to provide references for the majority of clinicians.
Outcomes for maximal bilateral lateral rectus recession in large-angle exotropia

David D Chong,Blake A Boehm,Urvi Gupta,Zeina Salem,Jason Singer,Faruk H Örge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.007

Abstract:Background: Surgical treatment for large-angle exotropia can be challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes of patients with large-angle exotropia (≥50Δ) undergoing maximal bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession of 10 mm. Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients at our institution who underwent maximal bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for exodeviation ≥50Δ from January 1, 2008, to July 22, 2022. We subdivided the cohort into large-angle exotropia (largest amount of exodeviation at near and/or distance ≥50Δ and <65Δ) and very large-angle exotropia (largest exodeviation ≥65Δ). Patients with a history of prior eye muscle surgery, neurologic deficits, and three- or four-muscle surgery were excluded. Results: A total of 22 patients were included. Mean preoperative exodeviation at distance was 51.9Δ in the large-angle group and 67.5Δ in the very-large-angle group (P = 0.001). Outcomes for the large-angle and very-large angle groups were, respectively, as follows: mean follow-up, 31.1 weeks and 11.8 weeks (P = 0.97); success, 75.0% and 16.7% (P = 0.02); undercorrection rates, 18.7% and 83.3% (P = 0.01); and mean postoperative exodeviation at distance, 3.7Δ ± 6.3Δ and 28.0Δ ± 13.5Δ (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Our study identified good surgical outcomes (75%) with maximal bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession of 10 mm in treating patients with large-angle exotropia between 50Δ and <65Δ. Other surgical techniques such as recession-resection and three- or four-muscle surgery may result in better outcomes when treating patients with exotropia ≥65Δ.
Outcome of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection in primary exotropia

Quratul Ain Saleem,Alyscia M Cheema,Muhammad Ali Tahir,Arif Rabbani Dahri,Tahir M Sabir,Javed H Niazi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-257

2013-07-08

Abstract:Background: The purpose of this study was to measure the success rate of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection in primary exotropia. Methods: This is an interventional case series of 55 patients with primary exotropia (degree of deviation 15-85 PD), above the age of 5 years. Patients were treated in the Department of Ophthalmology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan, during the period of July 2009 to March 2010. All the patients underwent surgical procedure i.e., lateral rectus muscle recession (maximum up to 10 mm) and medial rectus muscle resection (up to 6 mm) of one eye, according to the Park's method. Surgery was done based on prism cover test measurements obtained at 6 m with appropriate optical correction in place. Patients were re evaluated at one day, one month, two months and six months post operatively. Final outcome was considered at the end of six months at which achievement of ≤10 PD of exotropia was the success. Data was analyzed on SPSS version 17.0. Results: We obtained success (≤10 PD) in 42 out of 55 patients (76.4%) and 13 out of 55 patients (23.6%) did not meet our criteria for surgical success (>10 PD). Analysis of success with the type of primary exotropia showed that success was achieved in 22 out of 24 cases of intermittent type (91.6%) and 20 out of 31 cases of constant type (64.5%)(P Value 0.019). The highest percentage of success was achieved in patients with the pre-operative deviation of ≤70 PD i.e., 93.3% (42 out of 45 cases), while none of the patients with the pre-operative deviation of >70 PD (10 out of 10 cases) achieved the criteria for success. Conclusion: We conclude that pre-operative deviation is one of the strongest predictor for favorable surgical outcome. Therefore, eliminating the factors causing error in the correct determination of pre-operative deviation should improve the success and predictability of the surgical outcome. Despite the obstacles in the surgical management of strabismus, our results are encouraging.
Slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia: a retrospective study

Meiyu Ren,Qi Wang,Lihua Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01562-2

2020-07-14

Abstract:Background: The present study sought to investigate the efficiency and safety of slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession for the treatment of convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia. Methods: This retrospective study included 34 patients who underwent slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia in Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between September 2013 and October 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. A successful surgical alignment was defined as + 5 (positive for esotropia) to - 10 (negative for exotropia) prism diopters (PD) of orthotropia in the primary position while viewing distant or near targets and a near-distance deviation difference ≤ 8PD. Results: The mean age of the patients at surgery was 7.09 ± 3.80 years (range, 3 to 18 years). The mean distance deviations were - 26.09 ± 6.5 PD (range, - 15 to - 35 PD) and the mean near deviations, - 37.21 ± 6.3 PD (range, - 25 to - 45 PD) preoperatively. The mean recession amount of upper pole of the lateral rectus was 5.97 mm (range, 4.0 to 7.5 mm) and that of lower pole of the lateral rectus, 7.49 mm (range, 6.0 to 8.5 mm). At a mean follow-up of 15.0 months (range, 6 to 37 months), the surgical success rate was 70.6% (24/34), the under-correction rate was 17.6% (6/34), and the overcorrection rate was 11.8% (4/34). The mean near-distance deviation difference was significantly reduced from 11.12 ± 2.06 PD (range, 10 to 15 PD) preoperatively to 2.47 ± 3.04 PD (range, 0 to 10 PD) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Each millimeter of difference between the upper and lower poles of the lateral rectus recession was associated with an improvement of 5.65 PD in the near-distance deviation difference. At the final follow up, a near-distance deviation difference of ≤8PD was found in 32 (94.1%) patients. None of the patients developed A-V pattern, torsional diplopia, or restricted abduction of the eyes. Conclusions: Slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession may successfully reduce the distance and near exodeviations and the near-distance deviation difference, thus was proved to be an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia.
Combined recession and resection of the same lateral Rectus in the treatment of exotropia

Dominique Thouvenin,Léopoldine Lequeux,Christelle Bonifas,Isabel Deboutte

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241229318

2024-02-18

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:European Journal of Ophthalmology, Ahead of Print. BackgroundBesides rest position abnormalities, exotropia could also be due to hypertonia of the Lateral Recti (LR) given divergence frequently decreases under general anesthesia (GA). Combined Recession-Resection of the Same Muscle (RRSM) is a promising alternative to the Faden procedure in the surgical treatment of overacting MR in esotropia. We thus examined here the effectiveness of combined RRSM of the LR for the treatment of exotropia that decrease under GA.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center evaluation over a 16-month period of 100 patients operated on for exotropia that decreased under deep GA (91% of 110 consecutive operated cases). We excluded re-operations and pure convergence insufficiencies. We performed a combined RRSM of one or two LR. It included a 10mm-recession and a "fine-tuned" resection of LR based on Quantitative Forced Duction Test scores. MR resection was combined when exotropia exceeded 35PD or for unilateral surgery. We report on patient outcomes 6 months after surgery.ResultsSuccessful results were obtained (−8–+8 PD measured on Alternate Cover Test) among 83% of cases at distance fixation and 91% at near fixation after 6 months. The Newcastle Control Score also improved from 5.8 to 1.7 after 6 months. No surgery-related complications or repeat surgeries were reported.ConclusionsIn our experience a majority of exotropias decrease under GA and our strategy of combined RRSM of the LR is effective for the treatment of such exotropias. Long-term follow-up of the cohort is required to investigate the stability of these outcomes, and confirmation of our results by other works

ophthalmology
Surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession versus recess-resect in children with convergence insufficiency type intermittent exotropia

Yoon Kyung Jang,Seok Hyun Bae,Dong Gyu Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12664-w

2022-05-21

Abstract:To determine the efficacy of unilateral lateral rectus recession (ULR) for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-type IXT), we compared surgical outcomes following ULR and recess‒resect (RR) procedures for CI-type IXT. In this retrospective study, medical records of 57 children who underwent ULR (n = 30) or RR (n = 27) for CI-type IXT of less than 25 PD at distance with a postoperative follow-up of 6 months or more were reviewed. Surgical success was defined as an alignment between 10 PD exodeviation and 5 PD esodeviation at distance and near fixation. The postoperative exodeviation showed no significant difference between the two groups at the last follow-up. A significant reduction in the mean near-distance difference was achieved postoperatively in both groups: from 5.4 PD preoperatively to 2.5 at last follow-up after ULR, and from 8.2 to 2.4 after RR (both p = 0.001). However, this difference between ULR and RR was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The success rate at the last follow-up was 63.3% for ULR and 70.4% for RR (p = 0.574). ULR was found to be an effective treatment for CI-type IXT, with similar surgical outcomes to RR.
Long-term postoperative outcomes of bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral recession-resection for intermittent exotropia

Xian Yang,Teng-Teng Man,Qiao-Xia Tian,Gui-Qiu Zhao,Qing-Lan Kong,Yan Meng,Yan Gao,Mei-Zhen Ning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.25

2014-12-18

Abstract:Aim: To discuss the long-term postoperative results of bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) and unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection (RR) in therapy of intermittent exotropia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 213 cases of intermittent exotropia who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2010. The patients were grouped into BLR group and RR group. Motor outcomes were divided into three groups on the basis of the angle of deviation after surgery: overcorrection (esotropia/phoria >5(Δ)), orthophoria (esotropia/phoria ≤5(Δ) to exotropia/phoria ≤10(Δ)), and undercorrection/recurrence (exotropia/phoria >10(Δ)). Titmus test was used to evaluate stereoacuity, the stereoacuity <800s of arc meaned the patients had stereopsis. Surgical outcome including motor criteria and sensory status were compared at postoperative 6, 12, 24mo and at 36mo examination between groups. Results: At 12, 24mo after surgery, the motor outcomes had no difference (P>0.05) between groups. However, the motor outcomes at 6, 36mo were signally different in each group, indicating the success rate in RR group at 6mo was higher than that in BLR group (83.02% vs 82.24%, P<0.05) but the result was contrary at the 3y examination (60.75% vs 43.40%, P<0.05). No statistical significance were found in the sensory outcomes between the groups at mean of 3.7y follow-up. Conclusion: The motor outcomes in RR group were better than in BLR group at 6mo after surgery, while the 3y outcomes were better in BLR group. This may be due to the recurrence rate of the BLR was lower than the RR group's.
Surgical Correction of Consecutive Esotropia With Unilateral Medial Rectus Recession

Chrysavgi Adamopoulou,Rajesh C Rao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20150929-16

Abstract:Purpose: Unilateral medial rectus recession is a treatment option to surgically correct consecutive esotropia. This study evaluated the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent unilateral medial rectus recession for the treatment of consecutive esotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia. Methods: The medical records of 16 patients who underwent surgical correction of consecutive esotropia with unilateral medial rectus recession were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with intermittent exotropia who were previously treated with one or multiple surgical procedures (8 bilateral lateral rectus recession, 7 recess-resect procedure, or 1 bilateral medial rectus resection) were included in the study. Three patients were adults and 13 patients were children. The mean age was 5 years for children and 50.3 years for adults. Consecutive esotropia was defined as residual manifest esodeviation of 10 prism diopters (PD) at 6 months postoperatively. Successful correction of consecutive esotropia was defined as the lack of manifest or intermittent tropia and esophoria/exophoria within 8 PD. Patients with monofixational exotropia were excluded from the study. Results: Unilateral medial rectus recession was successful in the correction of consecutive esotropia in 10 of 16 cases (62.5%). Six of 16 (37.5%) patients had unsatisfactory postoperative alignment, with 5 patients showing recurrence of exotropia. Only one patient was undercorrected. Conclusions: The success rate of surgical correction of consecutive esotropia with single muscle surgery was good. Recurrence of exotropia accounted for most of the failures, and all recurrences occurred in the group of patients initially treated surgically for intermittent exotropia with a recess-resect procedure.
Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Augmented Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession in Children With Intermittent Exotropia

Hyuna Kim,Hee Kyung Yang,Jeong-Min Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.003

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the long-term surgical outcomes of augmented bilateral lateral rectus (LR) recession with original surgery. Design: Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study. Methods: A total of 447 children with ≤35 prism diopters (PD) of basic and divergence excess-type intermittent exotropia, who underwent original bilateral LR recession based on the largest angle measured at distance and near, or augmentation surgery with the surgical dosage augmented by 1.0-1.5 mm more than the original formula were included. Patients were observed for at least 2 years. Success rates, cumulative probabilities of success, factors related to recurrence, and overcorrection were evaluated. Results: At a mean follow-up of 4.0 years, 48 of 101 patients (48%) undergoing original surgery maintained successful alignment within 10 PD of exophoria/tropia and 5 PD of esophoria/tropia; 49 (49%) had recurrence, and 3 (3%) had overcorrection. After augmented surgery, 203 of 346 patients (59%) were successfully aligned, 129 (37%) had recurrence, and 14 (4%) had overcorrection. Augmented surgery showed higher long-term successful alignment rates (P= .047) and lower recurrence rates compared to original surgery (P = .042) and the overcorrection rate was similar between the 2 groups (P= .774). Patients with divergence excess type showed higher cumulative success rates compared to that of the basic type (P = .010) after augmented surgery. Conclusion: Augmented bilateral LR recession resulted in more successful alignment and lower recurrence without higher overcorrection compared to the original surgery for the children with intermittent exotropia. Augmentation of the original table should be considered when planning bilateral LR recession, especially in patients with divergence excess-type exotropia.

Unilateral versus bilateral lateral rectus recession for correction of small to moderate angle exotropia

Bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession/resection for basic intermittent exotropia

Unilateral lateral rectus recession is an effective surgery for intermittent exotropia in young children

Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes Between Unilateral Recession and Unilateral Recession-Resection in Small-Angle Exotropia

Comparison of lateral rectus muscle re-recession and medial rectus muscle resection for treatment of postoperative exotropia

Comparison of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession for Small Angle Intermittent Exotropia: Outcomes and Surgical Dose-Responses

Bilateral Medial Rectus Advancement versus Unilateral Medial Rectus Advancement with Lateral Rectus Recession for Surgical Management of Large Angle Consecutive Exotropia without Adduction Deficit

Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia

Comparison of surgical outcomes between bilateral recession and unilateral recession-resection in moderate-angle intermittent exotropia

Bilateral vs unilateral medial rectus resection for recurrent exotropia after bilateral lateral rectus recession

Predictive Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcome of Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession

Botulinum toxin augmented bilateral lateral rectus recession versus three muscles surgery in large-angle intermittent exotropia

[How to understand the excessive lateral rectus muscle recession]

Outcomes for maximal bilateral lateral rectus recession in large-angle exotropia

Outcome of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection in primary exotropia

Slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia: a retrospective study

Combined recession and resection of the same lateral Rectus in the treatment of exotropia

Surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession versus recess-resect in children with convergence insufficiency type intermittent exotropia

Long-term postoperative outcomes of bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral recession-resection for intermittent exotropia

Surgical Correction of Consecutive Esotropia With Unilateral Medial Rectus Recession

Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Augmented Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession in Children With Intermittent Exotropia