A "food insecurity poverty line" to replace the official threshold in Canadian rural and urban settings? A single-person household perspective

Kent Ross,Tong Liu,Xiaolin Guo,Jesse Matheson,Daniel J. Dutton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00485-2
IF: 3.526
2024-05-14
Journal of Public Health Policy
Abstract:Household food insecurity is associated with both low income and high cost of living, it is a potentially better measure for consumption compared to income. We use data on food insecurity and income from 10 years of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2007–2017) of single-person households ( n = 145,044) to estimate the probability of being food insecure at the Canadian poverty thresholds (Market Basket Measure thresholds, or MBMs), and determine the income required to reach that probability in each MBM region, aggregated by province and rural/urban status. A regression model shows the probability of being food insecure at the MBM is approximately 30% which we call the Food Insecurity Poverty Line (FIPL). The income required to meet the FIPL is substantially different from the MBM, sometimes 1.25 times the MBM. This implies that food insecurity is a potential sentinel measure for poverty.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?