Abstract:Purpose: The main objective of the study was to examine Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organizational reputation. Preliminary empirical review revealed a strong positive correlation between CSR activities and organizational reputation across industries and geographical contexts. Companies prioritizing CSR initiatives like environmental sustainability and ethical practices are perceived more favorably by stakeholders, underscoring CSR's role in enhancing reputation and trust. Transparent communication of CSR efforts through various channels strengthens this reputation further. Additionally, the study identifies mediating and moderating factors such as CEO characteristics and industry norms, emphasizing the importance of strong leadership and tailored strategies. Ultimately, integrating CSR into strategic decision-making, transparent communication, and adaptation to stakeholder expectations are crucial for building a positive reputation that fosters long-term success. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Stakeholder theory, Institutional theory and the Resource Based View theory may be used to anchor future studies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The study provided comprehensive recommendations based on its findings. Firstly, it suggests prioritizing CSR initiatives aligned with core values and business objectives to enhance reputation and build stakeholder trust. Secondly, transparent communication strategies should be adopted to convey CSR efforts effectively, fostering credibility and engagement. Furthermore, integrating CSR into overall business strategy and operations ensures its alignment with organizational culture and decision-making processes, maximizing its impact. Investing in stakeholder engagement enhances the effectiveness of CSR initiatives by involving diverse stakeholders in program design and evaluation. Additionally, monitoring and evaluating CSR impact through both quantitative and qualitative metrics is essential for accountability and continuous improvement. Lastly, leadership commitment and organizational culture are emphasized as crucial drivers of CSR, with senior executives playing a pivotal role in fostering an ethical and socially responsible environment that enhances organizational reputation and sustainability.

Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its Influence on Organizational Reputation

The Causal Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation on Brand Equity: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

The impact of corporate social responsibility on the sustainable financial performance of Italian firms: mediating role of firm reputation

Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, corporate reputation, and firms’ market value: Evidence from the automobile industry

The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies

Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility

Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Trust, and Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Performance

Corporate social responsibility and financial performance – the role of corporate reputation, advertising and competition

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance Mediated by Corporate Strategy, Corporate Reputation, Stakeholder Engagement & Political Connection

The Impact of Social Responsibility on the Performance of European Listed Companies

Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment

Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy to Enhance Firm Reputation and Competitive Advantage

How does corporate social responsibility transform brand reputation into brand equity? Economic and noneconomic perspectives of CSR

Part IV: How Do Reputations Affect Corporate Performance?: Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources

Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective

The corporate social responsibility challenge on financial performance: Portuguese business situation

Effects of corporate social responsibility on employee commitment and corporate reputation: Evidence from a transitional economy

Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation

Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Moderating Impact of Economic Cycles and Financial Performance