Psychosocial Difficulties Profiles Among Youth with Intellectual Disabilities

Elizabeth Olivier,Amy Jolin,Céleste Dubé,Christophe Maïano,Danielle Tracey,Rhonda G. Craven,Alexandre J. S. Morin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06359-6
2024-05-17
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Abstract:This study sought to identify the various configurations, or profiles, of internalizing and externalizing behaviors found among a sample of youth with intellectual disabilities (ID). These behaviors were assessed twice over one year, using self, parental, and teacher reports. Six variables were hypothesized to predict profile membership: Parent–child relationship (i.e., warmth and conflict), student–teacher relationship (i.e., warmth and conflict), peer acceptance, and peer victimization. To this end, we conducted Latent Profile Analysis among a sample of 393 youth with ID (aged 11–22 years old) recruited in Canada (French-speaking; n = 142; 49.30% boys) and Australia (English-speaking; n = 251; 67.30% boys). Our results revealed five profiles: (1) Adjusted (13.48%), (2) Mild School-related Difficulties (34.38%), (3) Underestimation of Mild Difficulties (12.40%), (4) High Difficulties (19.45%), and (5) Internalizing Difficulties Unobserved at School (20.19%). These profiles, as well as profile membership, remained stable over time. Lower levels of student–teacher warmth, lower levels of peer acceptance, and higher levels of peer victimization were associated with a higher likelihood of membership into profiles characterized by above-average levels of psychosocial difficulties, especially self-reported. Based on these findings, future interventions addressing internalizing and externalizing behaviors could benefit from focusing on the school environment, notably peer acceptance and student–teacher warmth.
psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?