Not all uncivil behaviours are equal: exploring responses to incivility in veterinary practice using vignettes

A. IrwinH. Silver-MacMahonL. SantosL. MossopK. Macconnella Applied Psychology & Human Factors research group,School of Psychology,University of Aberdeen,Aberdeen,UKb Being Human Consulting Ltd,London,UKc School of Biodiversity,One health & Veterinary Medicine,University of Glasgow,Glasgow,UKd University of Lincoln,Lincoln,UK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2343939

IF: 2.5612

2024-04-23

Ergonomics

Abstract:Workplace incivility is considered a common workplace stressor, linked to a range of adverse impacts such as reduced wellbeing. However, there is a lack of research focused on how targets of incivility respond. The current study addresses that gap by examining responses to incivility within veterinary practice. Veterinarians and veterinary nurses ( n = 132) evaluated six scenarios depicting two types of incivility (direct e.g. demeaning comments/indirect, for example, ignoring someone) across three instigators (clients, co-workers, senior colleagues), reporting their perception and appraisal of the uncivil behaviour depicted along with potential responses. Direct incivility was linked to responses such as reciprocation, exit, and support seeking, whereas indirect incivility was associated with affiliative and ignoring responses. Negative appraisal of incivility predicted a higher likelihood of exit, avoidance, support seeking and reporting responses. These findings suggest that incivility targets utilise a broad range of response options and adapt their response dependent on the situation. This study investigated the influence of incivility type (direct/indirect) and instigator (client/co-worker/senior colleague) on response selection within veterinary practice. Participant responses were linked to incivility type and instigator status, indicating that utilisation of responses can be variable and adaptive to the situation.

engineering, industrial,ergonomics,psychology, applied

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the reaction patterns of veterinarians and veterinary nurses in veterinary practice when facing uncivilized behaviors of different sources (clients, colleagues, superiors) and different types (direct and indirect). Specifically, the research aims to answer the following research questions:

1. **Does the perceived degree of incivility vary according to the type of uncivilized behavior (direct vs. indirect) and the originator (client, colleague, superior)?**
2. **Does the evaluation of the behavior vary according to the type of uncivilized behavior (direct vs. indirect) and the originator (client, colleague, superior)?**
3. **Does the reported response vary according to the type of uncivilized behavior (direct vs. indirect) and the originator (client, colleague, superior)?**
4. **Is there an association between the perceived degree of incivility, behavior evaluation and the reported response?**
5. **Are there differences in the responses of veterinarians and veterinary nurses in terms of perceiving, evaluating and reporting uncivilized behaviors?**

Through these questions, the research aims to fill the research gap in the existing literature on how the targets of uncivilized behaviors react, and explore the changes in these reactions in different forms and sources of uncivilized behaviors. This helps to better understand workplace incivility in the veterinary industry and its impact, thereby providing a basis for formulating effective intervention measures.