Abstract:Background The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) is widely used in daily clinical practice in evaluating locomotive syndrome (LS). The questionnaire contains 25 questions aiming to describe 6 aspects, including body pain, movement-related difficulty, usual care, social activities, cognitive status, and daily activities. However, its potential underlying latent factor structure of the questionnaire has not been fully examined so far. Methods Five hundred participants who were 60 years or older and were able to walk independently with or without a cane but had complaints of musculoskeletal disorders were recruited face to face at the out-patient ward of Aichi Medical University Hospital between April 2018 and June 2019. All participants completed the GLFS-25. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models (single-factor model, 6-factor model as designed by the developers of the GLFS-25) were fitted and compared using Mplus 8.3 with a maximum likelihood minimization function. Modification indices, standardized expected parameter change were used, a standard strategy for scale development was followed in the search for an alternative and simpler model that could well fit the collected data. Cronbach’s α and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were also calculated. Results Mean (standard deviation) participants age was 72.6 (7.4) years old; 63.6% of them were women. Under the current criteria, 132 (26.4%) and 262 (52.4%) of the study subjects would be classified as LS stage 1 and stage 2, respectively. Overall, the Cronbach’s α (95% CI) for GLFS-25 evaluated using these data was 0.959 (0.953, 0.964). The single- and 6-factor models were rejected due to poor fit. The alternative models with either full 25 questions or a shortened GLFS-16 were found to fit the data better. These alternative models included three latent factors (body pain, movement-related difficulty, and psycho-social complication) and allowed for cross-loading and residual correlations. Discussion The findings of the CFA models provided evidence that the factor structure of the GLFS-25 might be simpler than the 6-factor model as suggested by the designers. The complex relationships between the latent factors and the observed items may also indicate that individual sub-scale use or simply combining the raw scores for evaluation is likely to be inadequate or unsatisfactory. Thus, future revisions of the scoring algorithm or questions of the GLFS-25 may be required.

Assessment of Geriatric Depression Scale's Applicability in Longevous Persons based on Classical Test and Item Response Theory

Psychometric properties and modification of the 15-item geriatric depression scale among Chinese oldest-old and centenarians: a mixed-methods study

Application of Short Form Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) In Chinese Elderly

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and Validity of the Phq-9 for Screening Late-Life Depression in Chinese Primary Care

The Reliability and Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale(PHQ-9)in the Elderly Population in Community

Peer Review #2 of "assessment of Locomotive Syndrome among Older Individuals: a Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (V0.3)"

Assessment of Locomotive Syndrome among Older Individuals: a Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale

The Development of the Social Health Scale for the Elderly.

Is geriatric depression scale a valid instrument to screen depression in Chinese community-dwelling elderly?

Validity of Cognitive Function Assessed by a Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire As Compared with Objective Cognitive Tests in Community‐dwelling Older Adults in China

Longitudinal Invariance of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Chinese Elders

Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender Groups of the 15-Item Geriatric Depression Scale Among Chinese Elders

Comparison of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening depression in older adults.

Validation and Comparison of Three Short Depression Screening Tools among Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Use of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community‐based Integrated Care System 21 Items among Chinese Community‐dwelling Older Adults

Chinesization of Long - term Condition Empowerment Scale and Its Reliability and Validity in Community Middle - aged and Aged Patients with Chronic Disease

Reliability and Validity of 10-item CES-D among Middle Aged and Older Adults in China

A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J)

Use of General Self-Effiacy Scale(GSES) in Chinese Aged People

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) among Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults