Abstract:Background Women are at higher risk of mortality from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (1) when compared to men. There is a lack of consensus among studies examining the effect of sex on outcomes from cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) (2-5). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the relationship between outcomes of AMI-CS and sex. Purpose To examine sex-related differences in mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Methods Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in February 2023 for studies reporting in-hospital or 30-day sex-specific mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Inclusion criteria consisted of observational or randomised controlled trials of adult patients with cardiogenic shock that reported unadjusted or adjusted (by odds or risk ratio) mortality rates by sex. In-hospital or 30-day mortality were treated as equivalent. Data were extracted for study size, number of men and women, unadjusted and adjusted mortality rates, and factors used in multivariable analysis. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. Meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model with inverse variant weighting, due to predicted high heterogeneity of included studies. Data are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). P values were adjusted for multiple comparison using Holm-Bonferonni correction. The primary outcomes were unadjusted and adjusted sex-specific mortality rates due to AMI-cardiogenic shock. Results 4,286 studies were identified and 37 met inclusion criteria, pooling a total of 630,890 patients. Raw 30-day/in-hospital mortality of females with AMI-cardiogenic shock was 41.2% compared to 32.3% in males. Unadjusted OR for mortality in females was 1.42 (95% CI 1.31–1.55, p <0.001, t2 = 0.02, I2 = 70.3%), and the adjusted OR was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04–1.20, p <0.001, t2 = 0.01, I2 = 76.8%). Eight studies included data on use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), which was used in 31.2% of females compared to 39.9% of males. OR for use of MCS in females compared to males was 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.77, p < 0.001, t2 = 0.003, I2 = 35.2%). Conclusions Women with AMI-related cardiogenic shock are at greater risk of death compared to male patients and are less often treated with MCS. Potential explanations include residual confounding factors, differences in AMI-cardiogenic shock pathophysiology between men and women, and sex-related differences in healthcare behaviours, but we cannot exclude the effect of systemic bias on outcomes. Further research is required to address the causes of sex disparities in outcomes and ensure equitable management of AMI-cardiogenic shock in women.Unadjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CSAdjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CS

The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Gender Disparities in Patients’ Decisions about the Management of Myocardial Infarction in East Chinese Province

Sex Differences in Mortality after an Acute Coronary Syndrome Increase with Lower Country Wealth and Higher Income Inequality.

Sex-based analysis of NSTEMI processes of care and outcomes by hospital: a nationwide cohort study

Sex-Based Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Older Adults Hospitalized Across 6 High-Income Countries: An Analysis From the International Health Systems Research Collaborative

Sex Differences in Management, Time to Intervention, and In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock

Sex differences in outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis

Differences in Social Hardships in Women and Men with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Impact on 30-Day Readmission

Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction - Preliminary results from an umbrella review

The Sex Difference in 6-Month MACEs and Its Explaining Variables in Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors: Data from CPACS-3 Study.

Sex Disparities in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program

Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Sex differences in health outcomes at one year following acute myocardial infarction: A report from the China Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events prospective acute myocardial infarction study

Sex Differences in In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Findings from the CCC Project

Sex Differences in Ventricular Arrhythmias and Adverse Outcomes Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

Gender disparities among hospitalised patients with acute myocardial infarction, acute decompensated heart failure or pneumonia: retrospective cohort study

Sex Disparity in Characteristics, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Henan STEMI Registry

Evaluating Sex Disparities in the Emergency Department Management of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Socioeconomic Status and Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Gender differences in prognosis and treatment in acute coronary syndrome at the coronary care unit

Young female acute myocardial infarction patients have worse all-cause mortality compared to males: insights from a national myocardial infarction registry