Abstract:In response to the Letter by Sandve et al. (2015) in New Phytologist, we reiterate our earlier conclusion that multiple rounds of both ancient and recent hybridizations have likely occurred within the Aegilops–Triticum complex. We agree with Sandve et al. (2015) that the nomenclature of Aegilops/ Triticum lineages is complex. Indeed, there is a contradiction in how they themselves have defined ‘the D genome lineage’ in their Letter (Sandve et al., 2015), compared to their earlier paper (Marcussen et al., 2014). Fig. 1 of Sandve et al. (2015) defines it as a clade comprising D + S* + M genome species; this definition is consistent with the clade we identified in our cpDNA phylogeny (Fig. 1 of Li et al., 2015). By contrast, the nuclear gene phylogeny of Marcussen et al. (2014) places M-genome species (e.g. Ae. comosa) within the B-genome lineage, not the D-genome lineage (see Fig. S6 of Marcussen et al., 2014). This contradiction between the chloroplast and nuclear phylogenies is consistent with our previous inference of a complex hybridization history for the D-genome lineage. It is not consistent with a single homoploid hybrid origin of the D + S* + M clade, as inferred by Sandve et al. (2015). Moreover, contrary to the assertion by Sandve et al. (2015) that we confounded the modern D genome and the D-genome lineage (as defined in Fig. 1 of Sandve et al., 2015), we explicitly drew this distinction in our analyses (e.g. Table 2 of Li et al., 2015; showing results both for extant D-genome species and for ‘the ancient D-genome lineage’). We also explicitly considered the single homoploid hybrid origin model favored by Sandve et al. (2015) for the D-genome lineage (see Fig. 2a of Li et al., 2015); however, the conflicting chloroplast and nuclear phylogenies described earlier led to our inference of a more complex hybridization history. Regarding the timescale of the hybridization event(s), we agree with Sandve et al. (2015) that ancient homoploid hybridization between ancestral genomes of A- and B-genome lineages likely played a role in the formation of the ancestor of the D-genome lineage. However, we reassert that the inference of a single, ancient homoploid hybrid origin specific to the D-genome lineage (D + S* + M species) – is not conclusively supported by the nuclear gene trees of Marcussen et al. (2014). Under their hypothesis, Aegilops tauschii and Ae. sharonensis should share the same pre-speciation ancestry because they are included in the (D,(S*,M)) clade. As such, the two species should be phylogenetically sister, relative to species in the lineages of the two putative ancestral genome donors, S and A. However, as we noted in our previous Letter, in 40% of the nuclear gene trees, one of these D-genome lineage species is grouped as sister to an S- or A-genome lineage species (Li et al., 2015). Two of these topologies are shown in Fig. 1. These data imply a more complex evolutionary history than can be explained by any single hybridization event. Finally, we agree with Sandve et al. (2015) that sequencing and analysis of additional diploid and polyploid Aegilops–Triticum species will likely provide new evidence for additional hybridization events. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31290210, 31470010) and the Program for Introducing Talents to Universities (B07017).

The phylogeny of the Triticeae: Resolution and phylogenetic conflict based on genomewide nuclear loci

The phylogeny of Triticeae Dumort. (Poaceae): resolution and phylogenetic conflict based on a genome-wide selection of nuclear loci

RPB2 sequences reveal a close phylogenetic relationship between tetraploid Hordelymus and diploid Hordeum species in Triticeae (Poaceae)

Genome-wide Identification and Transcriptional Analyses of the R2R3-MYB Gene Family in Wheat

Triticeae crop genome biology: an endless frontier

Molecular phylogeny of the genus Triticum L

The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: noncoding versus rbcL sequences.

Incomplete Lineage Sorting and Introgression among Genera and Species of Liliaceae Tribe Tulipeae: Insights from Phylogenomics

Phylogenomics and topological conflicts in the tribe Anthospermeae (Rubiaceae)

Molecular Phylogenetic Studies on Members of the Brassica and Raphanus Genera Based on the Nuclear Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer, the Chloroplast Trnl Intron, Trnl-F, and Cpssrs

RNA-Seq Analysis Provides the First Insights into the Phylogenetic Relationship and Interspecific Variation Between Agropyron Cristatum and Wheat

Variation in Plastome Sizes Accompanied by Evolutionary History in Monogenomic Triticeae (Poaceae: Triticeae)

Biosystematics and evolutionary relationships of perennial Triticeae species revealed by genomic analyses

Phylotranscriptomics of Theaceae: generic-level relationships, reticulation and whole-genome duplication

Multiple Rounds of Ancient and Recent Hybridizations Have Occurred Within the Aegilops–Triticum Complex

Plastome phylogenomic study of Gentianeae (Gentianaceae): widespread gene tree discordance and its association with evolutionary rate heterogeneity of plastid genes

Evolutionary trajectory of organelle-derived nuclear DNAs in the Triticum/Aegilops complex species

Molecular mapping of wheat: major genes and rearrangements in homoeologous groups 4, 5, and 7

Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Data Sets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l

Its1 and Its2 Sequences of Four Possible Donors to Bread Wheat Genome and Their Phylogenetic Relationships

Utility of Triti-Map for bulk-segregated mapping of causal genes and regulatory elements in Triticeae