Leia R. Jones,Maurice J.W. Zwart,Nine de Graaf,Kongyuan Wei,Liu Qu,Jin Jiabin,Fu Ningzhen,Shin-E Wang,Hongbeom Kim,Emanuele F. Kauffmann,Roeland F. de Wilde,I. Quintus Molenaar,Ying Jui Chao,Luca Moraldi,Olivier Saint-Marc,Felix Nickel,Cheng-Ming Peng,Chang Moo Kang,Marcel Machado,Misha D.P. Luyer,Daan J. Lips,Bert A. Bonsing,Thilo Hackert,Yan-Shen Shan,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Yi-Ming Shyr,Baiyong Shen,Ugo Boggi,Rong Liu,Jin-Young Jang,Marc G. Besselink,Mohammad Abu Hilal

Abstract:Background Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly being implemented worldwide, with good results reported from individual expert centers. However, it is unclear to what extent outcomes will continue to improve during the learning curve, as large international studies are lacking. Methods An international retrospective multicenter case series, including consecutive patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy from 18 centers in 8 countries in Europe, Asia, and South America until December 31, 2019, was conducted. A cumulative sum analysis was performed to determine the inflection points for the feasibility (operative time and blood loss) and proficiency (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C and major morbidity) learning curves. Outcomes were compared in 3 groups on the basis of the learning curve inflection points. Results Overall, 2,186 patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy were included. The feasibility learning curve was reached after 30–45 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures and the proficiency learning curve after 90 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures. These inflection points created 3 phases, which were associated with major morbidity (24.7%, 23.4%, and 12.3%, P < .001) but not 30-day mortality (2.1%, 2.0%, and 1.5%, P = .670). Other outcomes mostly continued to improve, including median operative time 432, 390, and 300 minutes ( P < .0001), conversion 6.0%, 4.7%, and 2.7% ( P = .002), bile leakage 7.2%, 4.1%, and 2.4% ( P < .001), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage 6.5%, 6.1%, and 1.8% ( n = 21) but not R0 resection (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma only) 78.5%, 73.9%, and 82.8% ( P = .35), and 90-day mortality rate 3.1%, 3.5%, and 2.1% ( P = .191). Centers performing >20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually had lower rates of conversion, reoperation, and shorter median operative time as compared with centers performing 10–20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually. Conclusion This international multicenter study demonstrates that most outcomes of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy continued to improve during 3 learning curve phases without a negative effect on 90-day mortality. Randomized studies are needed in high-volume centers that have surpassed the first learning curves, to compare these outcomes with the open approach.

Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study A critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery

Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy is Associated with Lower Morbidity Compared to Open Pancreatoduodenectomy an Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies

Minimally invasive robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a pan-European registry a retrospective cohort study

Transatlantic differences in the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: an international multi-registry analysis

The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection

Perioperative textbook outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis in a Korean minimally invasive pancreatic surgery registry

The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study

A Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomies

Complexity and Experience Grading to Guide Patient Selection for Minimally-invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy

Impact of Patient Age on Outcome of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: a Propensity Score Matched Study.

International differences in the selection and outcome of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy: A transatlantic analysis

End-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy during minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: technical description and single center experience

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes - Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?

Learning curve stratified outcomes after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: International multicenter experience

Prospective cohort study on short-term outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with stented pancreaticogastrostomy

Outcome of Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients with Intestinal- and Pancreatobiliary Subtype Ampullary Cancer

Outcome of Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients with Intestinal- and Pancreatobiliary Subtype Ampullary Cancer: An International Multicenter Cohort Study

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and totally laparoscopic PD after overcoming learning curves with comparison of oncologic outcomes between open PD and minimally invasive PD

Benchmarking outcomes for distal pancreatectomy: critical evaluation of four multicenter studies