Abstract:Purpose: To measure the extension of cantilever lengths, thicknesses, and heights of zirconia prostheses in the lingual and facial areas of the distal screw access openings, and to evaluate the clinical performance regarding chipping or fracture of the distal cantilevered sections of double full-arch CAD/CAM screw-retained, stained, monolithic zirconia, gingival-colored ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses (MZ-FPs). Materials and methods: Ten edentulous patients were provided with a total of 20 CAD/CAM double full-arch MZ-FPs. The zirconia thicknesses around distal screw access openings at three different levels (crown height space, screw access opening lengths, and dimensions of the cantilevered segments) were measured in the resin prototypes. Patients were evaluated clinically (visually) without magnification, with intraoral digital photography, and radiologically by the author, approximately every 6 months. Ten patients with 20 MZ-FPs were evaluated. Twenty resin prototypes with 35 cantilevered segments (15 maxillary, 20 mandibular) were measured. The lingual and facial thicknesses of the resin frameworks and the crown height spaces of 35 distal access openings were measured. Results: The average extension of the maxillary cantilever segments was 7.72 mm; the mandibular cantilever average was 13.72 mm. The average crown height space for maxillary prostheses was 13.27 mm, for the mandibular prostheses it was 11.89 mm. Zirconia thickness around distal screw access openings at the middle of the crowns, margins and middle of the gingival areas (buccal side of maxillary prostheses) was 4.29, 3.79, and 3.87 mm, respectively. On the lingual sides the thicknesses were 3.13, 2.85, and 3.15 mm, respectively. For mandibular prostheses the thicknesses were 3.56, 3.08, and 3.15 mm, respectively, on the buccal sides, and 2.07, 2.00, and 2.99 mm, respectively, on the lingual sides. No implant failure or changes in the occlusal surface, chipping of the cuspid or incisal edges, or prosthesis distal extension fractures were observed during follow-up periods ranging from 2 to 7 years. The survival rate was 100% for implants and prostheses. In one of the patients, chipping of the pink ceramic was noted in the maxillary prosthesis 36 months after placement. Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that full-arch MZ-FPs without cutback, or with partial digital cutback and veneering ceramic, were a therapeutic option. Recommendations regarding the thickness of zirconia at the level of the distal screw access openings, the crown height spaces, and the lengths of the cantilever segments were recorded. Additional in vitro and clinical studies will be required for more scientific analysis of the criteria for design of this type of prosthesis to minimize prosthetic complications. Long-term and multicenter studies are needed to corroborate the findings discussed in this report.

A retrospective single cohort study on the 5–13 year clinical outcomes of implant‐supported cross‐arch fixed dental prostheses with monolithic zirconia‐based frameworks

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Outcome of Teeth Restored with CAD/CAM Zirconium Dioxide Post-Cores: a Retrospective Study with a Follow-Up Period of 3–6 Years

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study

Zirconia full-arch implant prostheses: Survival, complications, and prosthetic space dimensions with 115 edentulous jaws

Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications

Implant Survival and Complication Prevalence in Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years.

Zirconia-Based Screw-Retained Prostheses Supported by Implants: A Retrospective Study on Technical Complications and Failures

Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study

The Success and Complications of Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: A Systematic Review

Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design

Clinical Performance of Complete-Arch Implant- Supported Rehabilitations Using Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Restorations Bonded to CAD/CAM Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks up to 5 Years

Clinical reliability of CAD/CAM cross-arch zirconia bridges on immediately loaded implants placed with computer-assisted/template-guided surgery: a retrospective study with a follow-up between 3 and 5 years.

Technical complications and failures of zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants followed up to 7 years: a case series

Survival Rate, Biomechanical Complications, and Patient Satisfaction of Implant-Supported FRC Full-Arch Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with Follow up of 5 Years

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant‐supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study

Two-piece zirconia implants in the posterior mandible and maxilla: A cohort study with a follow-up period of 9 years

Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hardware complications and failure of three-unit zirconia-based and porcelain-fused-metal implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective cohort study with up to 8 years.

Fifteen-year recall period on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. A prospective observational study