MR Susceptibility Separation for Quantifying Lesion Paramagnetic and Diamagnetic Evolution in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Ziyan Zhu,Nashwan Naji,Javad Hamidi Esfahani,Jeff Snyder,Peter Seres,Derek J. Emery,Michelle Noga,Gregg Blevins,Penelope Smyth,Alan H. Wilman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29266
IF: 4.4
2024-02-04
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion evolution may involve changes in diamagnetic myelin and paramagnetic iron. Conventional quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can provide net susceptibility distribution, but not the discrete paramagnetic and diamagnetic components. Purpose To apply susceptibility separation (χ separation) to follow lesion evolution in MS with comparison to R2*/R2′/QSM. Study Type Longitudinal, prospective. Subjects Twenty relapsing–remitting MS subjects (mean age: 42.5 ± 9.4 years, 13 females; mean years of symptoms: 4.3 ± 1.4 years). Field Strength/Sequence Three‐dimensional multiple echo gradient echo (QSM and R2* mapping), two‐dimensional dual echo fast spin echo (R2 mapping), T2‐weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery, and T1‐weighted magnetization prepared gradient echo sequences at 3 T. Assessment Data were analyzed from two scans separated by a mean interval of 14.4 ± 2.0 months. White matter lesions on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery were defined by an automatic pipeline, then manually refined (by ZZ/AHW, 3/25 years' experience in MRI), and verified by a radiologist (MN, 25 years' experience in MS). Susceptibility separation yielded the paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility content of each voxel. Lesions were classified into four groups based on the variation of QSM/R2* or separated into positive/negative components from χ separation. Statistical Tests Two‐sample paired t tests for assessment of longitudinal differences. Spearman correlation coefficients to assess associations between χ separation and R2*/R2′/QSM. Significant level: P
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?