Failure to Rescue Pediatric Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single‐Center Study of Technical Complications in 500 Primary Grafts

Aniss Channaoui,Catherine de Magnée,Roberto Tambucci,Eliano Bonaccorsi‐Riani,Thierry Pirotte,Natalia Magasich‐Airola,Thierry Detaille,Laurent Houtekie,Renaud Menten,Dana Dumitriu,Marguerite van den Hove,Pamela Baldin,Françoise Smets,Isabelle Scheers,Giulia Jannone,Etienne Sokal,Xavier Stephenne,Raymond Reding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14861
2024-09-27
Pediatric Transplantation
Abstract:This study introduces a novel approach to assess failure to rescue (FTR) rates in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). By analyzing specific complications and their impact on patient and graft outcomes, the authors provide valuable insights for improving quality of care in this challenging surgical field. Background The concept of failure to rescue (FTR) has been used to evaluate the quality of care in several surgical specialties but has not been well‐studied after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed 500 pediatric LDLT performed at a single center between 1993 and 2022. The recipient outcomes were assessed by means of patient and graft survival rates, retransplantation rates, and arterial/portal/biliary complication rates. Graft and patient losses secondary to these complications were calculated regarding FTR for patients (FTRp) and grafts (FTRg). Results Overall 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 92.1%, respectively, the corresponding figures for graft survival being 92.7% and 89.8%. One‐year hepatic artery complication rate was 3.6% (n = 18 cases), the respective rates for portal vein complications and biliary complications being 5.7% (n = 57) and 15.6% (n = 101). One‐year FTRp rates for hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, anastomotic biliary stricture, and intrahepatic biliary stricture were 28.6%, 9.4%, 3.6%, and 0%, respectively. The corresponding FTRg rates being 21.4%, 6.3%, 0%, and 36.4%. Conclusion Such novel analytical method may offer valuable insights for optimizing quality of care in pediatric LDLT.
pediatrics,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?