Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine whether a company's corporate social responsibility (CSR) transparency (reflected in two separate dimensions of social transparency and environmental transparency) affects a company's dependence on expensive trade credit (TC) financing. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a panel of S&P 500 index companies between 2012 and 2019 and ordinary least squares estimators. Transparency ratings represented by Bloomberg scores capture both the quantity and quality of verified CSR practice information. Findings CSR transparency (CSRT) is negatively associated with a firm's dependence on expensive TC financing. This study's results continue to hold after a battery of robustness tests like substitute proxies for TC, use of two-stage least squares regression, industry-adjusted dependent variable, generalized linear model and bootstrapping approach. This association is stronger among companies with higher information asymmetry (IASY) and lower quality regarding governance and financial reporting. Further investigation indicates that potential channels through which CSRT mitigates a company's reliance on TC financing are the cost of debt (CoD) and stock liquidity. This study's findings suggest that transparent companies have a lower CoD and higher stock liquidity. This helps these companies to be more financially flexible and eventually less dependent on expensive TC financing. Originality/value By combining two separate research lines of TC and CSR, this study adds to both works of literature as it is the first (to the best of the authors' knowledge) to present evidence of the effect of CSRT proxied by Bloomberg scores on a company's reliance on TC (a real economic decision and financial policy). Additionally, this study documents the moderating effects of financial reporting quality, IASY and corporate governance on the relationship between CSRT and TC financing. In conclusion, this study provides empirical evidence regarding the potential mechanisms of CoD and stock liquidity, through which CSRT influences a company's reliance on TC financing.

Corporate sensitivity to sovereign credit distress: the mitigating effects of financial flexibility

Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis

How Valuable Is Financial Flexibility when Revenue Stops? Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis

The Role of Financial Flexibility on Enterprise Sustainable Development during the COVID-19 Crisis—A Consideration of Tangible Assets

Studying corporate liquidity and regulatory responses for economic recovery in COVID-19 crises

The relationship between sovereign credit rating changes and firm risk

In sickness and in debt: The COVID-19 impact on sovereign credit risk

The impact of market power and financial flexibility on corporate investment policy

Does companies' financial flexibility drive their leverage dynamics? New evidence

Discrepancy and cross-regional bias in sovereign credit ratings: Analyzing the role of public debt

Corporate Resilience During the Covid-19 Pandemic: the Role of ESG Performance and Financial Flexibility

Corporate social responsibility transparency and trade credit financing

Corporate Liquidity and Solvency in Europe During COVID-19: The Role of Policies

Modelling sovereign credit ratings and assessing the impartiality: A case study of China

The role of financial flexibility in corporate cash donations

The Riskiness of Credit Allocation and Financial Stability

Corporate risk disclosures in turbulent times: An international analysis in the global financial crisis

The risk of the sovereign debt default: the Eurozone crisis 2008–2013

Sovereign Risk Spill-Overs to Banking Sectors in Central America and the Caribbean

The moderating effects of corporate governance and investment efficiency on the nexus between financial flexibility and firm performance

Does ambiguity matter for corporate debt financing? Theory and evidence