Abstract:Introduction A comprehensive description of the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on the human body has never been published. All pregnancies pose an unquantifiable threat to one's health and childbirth has permanent, irreversible effects that are cumulative and often late-manifesting. This reality refutes the anti-abortion, pro-natalist claim that there is any such thing as an elective abortion. Objective Abortion access supports the fundamental human right to bodily autonomy and sexual self-determination, hence every abortion is performed in the service of the pregnant person's health. The neglect of these principles has allowed politically-motivated legislatures to introduce imprecise health exception language that does not acknowledge the actual impact of pregnancy and childbirth. Affirming that abortion is life-saving healthcare refutes the health exception fallacy. Methods Maternal mortality and morbidity statistics are flawed and incomplete. None of the standard measures adequately captures the effects of pregnancy, whether voluntary or forced, upon the health of the parturient or her community. This report elucidates the unpredictable and often unattributed morbidity associated with pregnancy and childbirth, and argues for a human rights approach to abortion policy. Results Abortion bans have downstream effects that negatively impact the care of all pregnancy-capable people and their communities. Allowing non-experts to legislate against evidence-based care creates confusion and leads to mistrust of the healthcare system. Gendered disinformation, gag rules, and criminalization of pregnancy all result in stigma and harm. Conclusions The cultural reluctance to seriously study the effects of pregnancy on health is linked to gender inequality and is correlated with restrictive abortion laws that violate ethical principles of beneficence and patient autonomy. Involuntary pregnancy is a major and preventable cause of human suffering that can be relieved with permissive abortion policies based on ethical and scientific standards of care. Disclosure No.

The "abortion imaginary": Shared perceptions and personal representations among everyday Americans

Interpersonal Abortion Conversations: Communication Characteristics Post-Roe

"To Anyone Reading in the Future You Are Not Alone": How Patients Seeking Abortion in a Surge State Use Their Stories to Support Each Other

Abortion Decisions as Humanizing Acts: The Application of Ambivalent Sexism and Objectification to Women-Centered Anti-Abortion Rhetoric

'I could see myself doing something like that': US women's engagement with characters who experience abortion, adoption and surrogacy on Little Fires Everywhere

Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States

Abortion and the struggle to be good in the 1970s

Memorable Messages about Pregnancy and Abortion from the Perspective of College-Enrolled Emerging Adults

Setting Boundaries Between Crime and Rights

The decision-making experiences of women who legally aborted: A meta-ethnography

A Cross-National Examination of Abortion Politics: Contrasting Perspectives in the United States and France

Tracking a Year of Polarized Twitter Discourse on Abortion

Abortion and America's ethical consciousness

Strategic (Non)Disclosure: Activation and Avoidance of Social Ties among Women Seeking Abortion

Abortion in entertainment media, 2019-2024

THE RELATIONSHIP OF CONTEXTUAL FACTORS TO WOMEN'S PERCEPTIONS OF MEDICAL ABORTION

(128) Abortion And The Myth Of The Harm-Free Pregnancy

How technology is reframing the abortion debate

News Coverage of Abortion in Relation to Race and Class in the United States in 2021

No bad abortions: Graphic abortion narratives as feminist discourse

Feeling better: representing abortion in 'feminist' television