Abstract:The Xiangshan uranium (U) ore field in South‐east China has been recognized as the largest volcanic‐related hydrothermal U deposit in China since its discovery in the 1950s. The U mineralization at Xiangshan is mostly hosted in felsic volcanic and sub‐volcanic rocks and occurs mainly in veins, which are controlled by high‐angle normal faults in association with haematite, quartz, fluorite, apatite, and pyrite. Likewise, diverse hydrothermal alterations such as haematitization, silicification, fluoritization, and illitization have been identified adjacent to the ore‐bearing faults and outward for tens to hundreds of metres into the volcanic rocks. Situated to the west in the Xiangshan ore field, the Shazhou deposit is the second‐largest U deposit in the Xiangshan volcanic basin. Based on geological field evidence and petrographic observations, the ore‐forming fluids in the Shazhou U deposit can be classified and separated into three stages (early, main, and late): (a) fluids associated with the early mineralization stage are characterized by the oxidizing feature with U‐O hydroxide complexes as the dominant species; (b) fluids from the main mineralization stage were reducing fluids with black–purple fluorite and sulphide complexes of U‐Ti‐O; and (c) fluids from the late‐stage were weakly oxidizing fluids with light purple fluorite and light red calcite complexes of U‐O as the dominant species in the fluid. Fluid inclusions in alteration minerals from the main and late mineralization stage recorded homogenization temperatures (Th) of 280–340°C and 200–260°C, with salinities of 5–17 and 6–10% NaCleqv, respectively. Ore‐forming fluids contain variable amounts of CO2, O2, and H2, in which the volatile content in the main mineralization stage is higher than that in the late stage. The temperature and salinity of the ore‐forming fluids were fluctuating and gradually decreased as the geologic history of the deposit progressed. The δDW‐SMOW values calculated for the ore‐forming fluids range from −97.4 to −65.1‰. The δ18O values of syn‐ore quartz occur mainly between 5.9 and 15.7‰; calculated δ18OW‐SMOW values are between −1.5 and +8.3‰. The δ34SCDT values of syn‐ore pyrite and galena range from 9.7 to 19.7‰. The ore‐forming fluids in the Shazhou U deposit are derived from different sources with a complex geological evolution history. The ore‐forming fluids from the early mineralization stage with high O2 contents may have been primarily derived from post‐volcanic hydrothermal activity. Subsequently, fluids from the main mineralization stage (with lower O2 and high H2 contents) might have originated from the deep‐sourced fluids, where sulphur was carried from the metamorphic basement. Finally, ore‐forming fluids from the late mineralization stage could have been produced by mixing meteoric hydrothermal fluids. Large‐scale fluid immiscibility and boiling occurred during the main mineralization stage, followed by fluid mixing during the late mineralization stage. Boiling and mixing of fluids were the two dominant mechanisms for the deposition of U in the Shazhou deposit. A new fluid evolution model was described through mineralogy, fluid inclusion (FI), and isotope studies in Shazhou volcanic‐related hydrothermal uranium (U) deposit, Xiangshan ore field, SE China. From the early stage to the late mineralization stage, the proportion of vapour phase in liquid‐rich FIs and abundance of pure gas FIs decreased significantly, the ore‐forming temperature ranges from 280 to 360°C, and rich in volatiles such as H2, CH4, and CO2. Ore‐forming fluids might originate from post‐volcanic hydrothermal activity and could have been affected by deep metamorphic water and mixed with meteoric water after the later mineralization stage. The most important mechanisms for the precipitation of U in the Shazhou deposit are related to changes in the physical–chemical conditions as well as fluid phase changes caused by fluid–rock interactions, fluid mixing, and boiling.

Genesis of the Mianhuakeng uranium deposit, South China: Constraints from in-situ sulfur isotopes and trace elements of pyrite

Characteristics of Mineralization-Forming Fluid and Metallogenic Mechanism for the Mianhuakeng Uranium Deposit in South China: Constraints from In Situ Geochemical Signatures and Sulfur Isotopes of Syn-Mineralization Pyrite and Pitchblende

In-situ Sulfur Isotope and Trace Element Analysis of Pyrite from the Xiwang Uranium Ore Deposit in South China: Implication for Ore Genesis

Genesis of the Mianhuakeng granite-related uranium deposit, South China: Insights from cathodoluminescence imaging, fluid inclusions, and trace elements composition of hydrothermal quartz

Mineralogy and geochemistry of hydrothermal alteration of the Mianhuakeng uranium deposit in South China: Implications for mineralization and exploration

Pyrite geochemistry and its implications on Au–Cu skarn metallogeny: An example from the Jiguanzui deposit, Eastern China

Fluid evolution and gold precipitation in the Muping gold deposit (Jiaodong, China): Insights from in-situ trace elements and sulfur isotope of sulfides

The origin of the carbonate-hosted Huize Zn–Pb–Ag deposit, Yunnan province, SW China: constraints from the trace element and sulfur isotopic compositions of pyrite

Mineralogical and geochemical constraints on the genesis of the granite-hosted Huangao uranium deposit, SE China

Textures, in situ trace element and sulfur isotope of pyrite from the sediment-hosted Cu–Co deposits in the Zhongtiao Mountains, Trans-North China Orogen: Implications for ore genesis

Whole-rock and biotite geochemistry of granites from the Miao’ershan batholith, South China: Implications for the sources of granite-hosted uranium ores

Metallogeny of the Zoujiashan Uranium Deposit in the Mesozoic Xiangshan Volcanic-Intrusive Complex, Southeast China: Insights from Chemical Compositions of Hydrothermal Apatite and Metal Elements of Individual Fluid Inclusions

Sulfur isotope and trace element geochemistry of sulfides from the unique Yaojialing Zn-Au-Cu deposit, Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt, China: Implications for ore-forming process and exploration

Iron and sulfur isotope fractionation during pyrite dissolution-reprecipitation revealed by in-situ isotopic analyses in the Muping gold deposit (Jiaodong, China)

Genesis of a Ag-Pb-Zn-F system: Insights from in situ sulfur isotope and trace elements of pyrite, and rare earth elements of fluorite in the Baiyine'lebu deposit, Inner Mongolia, China

Genesis and mineralization implications of dissolution–regrowth pyrite in the large Qukulekedong Au–Sb deposit, East Kunlun, NW China

Formation of the giant Maoping Mississippi Valley-type Pb–Zn (Ge) deposit via fluid mixing: Evidence from trace element and sulfur isotope geochemistry of pyrite

Nature and evolution of the ore‐forming fluids in the Shazhou volcanic‐related hydrothermal uranium deposit, Xiangshan ore field, SE China

Petrogenesis of U-rich two-mica granite from Reshui pluton, Nanling Range, South China and its implications for uranium mineralization

Nature and origin of primary ore-forming fluids in the highly metamorphosed Archean Hongtoushan VMS deposit, North China: Insights from in situ S isotopes and trace elements of sulfides

Metallogenic Model of the Fengyan Stratabound Zn-Pb Deposit in Fujian of Southeastern China: Constraints from Fluid Inclusions, C O S-Pb Isotopes, and Pyrite Chemistry