Taking the pulse of brain death: A meta‐analysis of the natural history of brain death with somatic support

Ivancarmine Gambardella,Francesco Nappi,Berhane Worku,Robert F. Tranbaugh,Aminat M. Ibrahim,Sandhya K. Balaram,James L. Bernat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16243
2024-02-21
European Journal of Neurology
Abstract:Scatterplot depicting the negative linear relationship between age at brain death diagnosis (x‐axis) and somatic survival length (y‐axis). FBD, functionally brain dead; NNFR, normal neurologic function recovered. The NNFR patient was censored at the time of latest follow‐up (1 year). For every 1‐year increase in age, there was an almost 12‐year decrease in somatic survival length. Patients with a somatic survival ≥ 1 year were all within the pediatric range (0–14 years). Background and purpose The conceptualization of brain death (BD) was pivotal in the shaping of judicial and medical practices. Nonetheless, media reports of alleged recovery from BD reinforced the criticism that this construct is a self‐fulfilling prophecy (by treatment withdrawal or organ donation). We meta‐analyzed the natural history of BD when somatic support (SS) is maintained. Methods Publications on BD were eligible if the following were reported: aggregated data on its natural history with SS; and patient‐level data that allowed censoring at the time of treatment withdrawal or organ donation. Endpoints were as follows: rate of somatic expiration after BD with SS; BD misdiagnosis, including "functionally brain‐dead" patients (FBD; i.e. after the pronouncement of brain‐death, ≥1 findings were incongruent with guidelines for its diagnosis, albeit the lethal prognosis was not altered); and length and predictors of somatic survival. Results Forty‐seven articles were selected (1610 patients, years: 1969–2021). In BD patients with SS, median age was 32.9 years (range = newborn–85 years). Somatic expiration followed BD in 99.9% (95% confidence interval = 89.8–100). Mean somatic survival was 8.0 days (range = 1.6 h–19.5 years). Only age at BD diagnosis was an independent predictor of somatic survival length (coefficient = −11.8, SE = 4, p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?