Regression discontinuity design studies: a guide for health researchers

Sebastian Calonico,Neal Jawadekar,Katrina Kezios,Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072254

2024-02-28

BMJ

Abstract:Everyday medical practice is largely shaped by evidence from clinical research activities, such as understanding treatment effects of prescribed drugs, changes in clinical guidelines, or program evaluation of medical services. While such evidence would ideally come from randomized controlled trials, these trials are not always feasible and are often conducted under strict criteria that might differ from real world settings; therefore, clinicians and other medical researchers often must resort to observational studies for answering key research questions. However, associational observational analysis is prone to multiple sources of bias, which leaves many medical researchers with limited options for conducting defensible causal inference research.Quasi-experimental methods, when used appropriately, can help to improve the validity of causal evidence generated from observational settings while also providing estimates potentially more applicable in real world settings than those from randomized controlled trials. One such method, regression discontinuity design (RDD), compares the outcomes of individuals who are...

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how to utilize the quasi-experimental method of Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) to enhance the validity of causal evidence generated from observational studies when Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are not feasible in clinical research. Specifically, the paper aims to:

1. **Introduce and Explain**: Introduce and explain the concept and principles of RDD to clinical researchers, as well as its application value in medical research, particularly its ability to perform causal inference under simulated experimental conditions.

2. **Provide Guidance**: Provide a detailed checklist, glossary, and a guided example to help clinical researchers understand and implement RDD analysis, including steps such as selecting bandwidth, setting up local polynomial models, estimating, and inferring RDD effects.

3. **Promote Adoption**: Encourage clinical researchers to more widely adopt the RDD method to enhance their ability to perform causal inference on observational data, especially when dealing with complex real-world medical data.

4. **Address Familiarity Issues**: Address the potential unfamiliarity or lack of training that clinical researchers might have with quasi-experimental designs like RDD by providing specific implementation guidelines and examples, enabling them to better read, conduct, and interpret RDD studies.

In summary, the goal of this paper is to help clinical researchers utilize the powerful tool of RDD to improve the accuracy and reliability of causal inference in observational studies through detailed methodological guidance.