Loneliness as a double-edged sword: an adaptive function with maladaptive consequences

Marlies Maes,Janne Vanhalst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2024.2333584

2024-03-27

European Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract:Loneliness is a construct that has increasingly been studied over the last decades. Although many people experience loneliness at some point in their lives without severe consequences, a vast body of empirical work has shown the detrimental effects of loneliness, suggesting that loneliness affects psychological well-being (e.g., depression, anxiety, lower self-esteem) as well as physical health (e.g., cardiovascular disease), and even early mortality. Recent theoretical work has suggested that the duration of loneliness might explain why loneliness might be beneficial for some people but destructive for others. Specifically, short-term loneliness might result in increased attempts to regain social connection and therefore serve an adaptive function, whereas long-term loneliness might result in maladaptive health outcomes. With this review, we highlight the double-edged sword of loneliness – that is, its adaptive function versus its maladaptive consequences – and we summarize the different ways in which previous work attempted to explain this phenomenon. Moreover, we aim to pinpoint some inconsistencies in the conceptualization and measurement of the duration of loneliness in previous work, and we offer considerations for future research to move the field forward.

psychology, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the dual nature of the complex emotional experience of loneliness—namely, its adaptive functions and maladaptive consequences. The author points out that although loneliness is typically viewed as a negative emotion, it actually has certain biological adaptive significance, prompting individuals to re-establish social connections. However, prolonged or chronic loneliness can have severe impacts on both mental and physical health.

The core argument of the paper is to distinguish between transient (temporary) loneliness and long-term (chronic) loneliness, and to discuss how these two types of loneliness respectively exhibit adaptive and maladaptive characteristics. Specifically:

1. **Adaptive Function**: Short-term loneliness may stimulate individuals to actively seek social interactions, helping to restore social connections, thus having adaptive value.
2. **Maladaptive Consequences**: Long-term experiences of loneliness may lead to a range of mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety, and can also harm physical health.

The paper further analyzes the different approaches to handling the duration of loneliness in existing research, and how this duration affects the nature and consequences of loneliness. Additionally, it suggests that more research is needed to explore the frequency, intensity, and other related factors of loneliness (such as individual differences, levels of social support, etc.) to better understand why loneliness primarily exhibits adaptive functions in some cases, while in others it leads to lasting negative impacts.

In summary, this review paper aims to emphasize the importance of understanding the adaptive and maladaptive characteristics of loneliness and calls for future research to more meticulously examine the various dimensions of loneliness and its effects on individual health.