Abstract:Purpose: To assess the image quality and impact on acquisition time of a novel deep learning based T2 Dixon sequence (T2DL) of the spine. Methods: This prospective, single center study included n = 44 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for lumbar MRI at our university radiology department between September 2022 and March 2023. MRI examinations were performed on 1.5-T and 3-T scanners (MAGNETOM Aera and Vida; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using dedicated spine coils. The MR study protocol consisted of our standard clinical protocol, including a T2 weighted standard Dixon sequence (T2std) and an additional T2DL acquisition. The latter used a conventional sampling pattern with a higher parallel acceleration factor. The individual contrasts acquired for Dixon water-fat separation were then reconstructed using a dedicated research application. After reconstruction of the contrast images from k-space data, a conventional water-fat separation was performed to provide derived water images. Two readers with 6 and 4 years of experience in interpreting MSK imaging, respectively, analyzed the images in a randomized fashion. Regarding overall image quality, banding artifacts, artifacts, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic confidence were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent image quality). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. Results: Forty-four patients (mean age 53 years (±18), male sex: 39 %) were prospectively included. Thirty-one examinations were performed on 1.5 T and 13 examinations on 3 T scanners. A sequence was successfully acquired in all patients. The total acquisition time of T2DL was 93 s at 1.5-T and 86 s at 3-T, compared to 235 s, and 257 s, respectively for T2std (reduction of acquisition time: 60.4 % at 1.5-T, and 66.5 % at 3-T; p < 0.01). Overall image quality was rated equal for both sequences (median T2DL: 5[3 -5], and median T2std: 5 [2 -5]; p = 0.57). T2DL showed significantly reduced noise levels compared to T2std (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -4]; p < 0.001). In addition, sharpness was rated to be significantly higher in T2DL (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -5]; p < 0.001). Although T2DL displayed significantly more banding artifacts (5 [2 -5] versus 5 [4 -5]; p < 0.001), no significant impact on readers diagnostic confidence between sequences was noted (T2std: 5 [2 -5], and T2DL: 5 [3 -5]; p = 0.61). Substantial inter-reader and intrareader agreement was observed for T2DL overall image quality (κ: 0.77, and κ: 0.8, respectively). Conclusion: T2DL is feasible, yields an image quality comparable to the reference standard while substantially reducing the acquisition time.

Prospective Comparison of Standard and Deep Learning-reconstructed Turbo Spin-Echo MRI of the Shoulder

Deep Learning for Under-Sampled Non-Cartesian ASL MRI Reconstruction

Deep learning reconstruction for lumbar spine MRI acceleration: a prospective study

Magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using deep learning–based algorithm

Evaluation of deep‐learning TSE images in clinical musculoskeletal imaging

Reconstruction of shoulder MRI using deep learning and compressed sensing: a validation study on healthy volunteers

Enhanced bone assessment of the shoulder using zero-echo time MRI with deep-learning image reconstruction

Application of deep learning reconstruction in abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for image quality improvement and acquisition time reduction

Comparative analysis of image quality and interchangeability between standard and deep learning-reconstructed T2-weighted spine MRI

Comparison of a deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence and its conventional counterpart for female pelvic MRI: reduced acquisition times and improved image quality

Accelerated High-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Turbo Spin Echo MRI of the Knee at 7 T

Assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy for cervical spondylosis using T2w-STIR sequence with a deep learning-based reconstruction approach

Faster acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging sequences of the knee via deep learning reconstruction: A volunteer study

Comparison of model-based versus deep learning-based image reconstruction for thin-slice T2-weighted spin-echo prostate MRI

Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of CT-like MR imaging in patients with suspected traumatic shoulder injury

Deep learning reconstructed T2-weighted Dixon imaging of the spine: Impact on acquisition time and image quality

Fully Automated Approach for Diagnosis of Supraspinatus Tendon Tear on Shoulder MRI by Using Deep Learning

Deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted imaging versus conventional T2-weighted imaging in the female pelvic cavity: image quality and diagnostic performance

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI

Evaluation of deep learning reconstructed high-resolution 3D lumbar spine MRI

Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning Reconstruction Facilitates Highly Accelerated Upper Abdominal MRI