Feasibility of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination regimens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer taking direct oral anticoagulants

Tasuku Nakabori,Kei Kunimasa,Masaki Kawabata,Sena Higashi,Kaori Mukai,Takahisa Kawamura,Takako Inoue,Motohiro Tamiya,Kazumi Nishino,Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7430
IF: 4.711
2024-06-26
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Potential exacerbation of the bleeding risk in atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev)‐based regimens in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a concern. This study analyzed the feasibility of Atezo/Bev regimens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lung cancer (LC) taking DOACs. Since DOACs did not have a considerable effect on bleeding events in the Atezo/Bev regimens for HCC or LC, Atezo/Bev regimens may be feasible for patients receiving DOACs under careful surveillance for bleeding. Aim Atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) combination immunotherapy regimens and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are both associated with bleeding. Therefore, combining Atezo/Bev regimens with DOACs may exacerbate the bleeding risk. This study investigated the feasibility of the Atezo/Bev regimen in patients taking DOACs. Methods This retrospective study included 141 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or advanced lung cancer (LC) treated with Atezo/Bev regimens. Patients who used antithrombotic agents other than DOACs were excluded. Bleeding events during the Atezo/Bev regimen were analyzed. Results The incidence rates of bleeding of any grade in the DOAC (n = 11) and no antithrombotic agent (NAA) (n = 130) groups were 9.1% and 10.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. Moreover, no significant difference was found in the frequency of bleeding of grade ≥3 between the DOAC and NAA groups. No patients in the DOAC group discontinued the Atezo/Bev regimen because of severe bleeding. Although serum albumin levels, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.298 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.105–0.847), independently contributed to bleeding events (p = 0.023), DOAC administration did not (HR: 1.357; 95% CI: 0.157–10.54; p = 0.770). Among only patients with HCC (n = 59), none of the five patients taking DOACs experienced bleeding events. A high albumin–bilirubin score (HR: 9.083, 95% CI: 1.118–73.76) was associated with bleeding events (p = 0.039). Conclusions DOACs did not have a considerable effect on bleeding events in the Atezo/Bev regimens for HCC or LC. Under careful surveillance for bleeding, Atezo/Bev regimens may be feasible in patients receiving DOACs.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?