A Comparative Study of Cavitary and Noncavitary Non–small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with CT-Guided Microwave Ablation

Sheng Xu,Zhi-Xin Bie,Yuan-Ming Li,Bin Li,Run-Qi Guo,Xiao-Guang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.05.006
IF: 3.682
2021-08-01
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>To explore the outcomes of CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in cavitary non-small cell lung cancer (c-NSCLC) patients, and to compare the outcomes of c-NSCLC and non-cavitary NSCLC (nc-NSCLC) treated with MWA.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and Methods</h3><p>A total of 317 NSCLC patients (194 males and 123 females) treated with MWA were included, consisting of 19 c-NSCLC patients and 298 nc-NSCLC patients. Complications, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to investigate the correlation of cavity and OS in NSCLC patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>A total of 364 MWA procedures were performed. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histopathological subtype in c-NSCLC patients (73.7%). c-NSCLC had an incidence rate of 57.9% in overall complications, which was significantly higher than that of 34.6% for nc-NSCLC (<em>P</em>=0.040). In a mean follow-up of 27.2±11.9 months, the median PFS and OS for c-NSCLC were 9.0±8.5 and 14.0±10.8 months, respectively, and those for nc-NSCLC were 13.0±10.7 and 17.0±10.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (<em>P</em>=0.180) or OS (<em>P</em>=0.133) between c-NSCLC and nc-NSCLC. In addition, the local recurrence rates for c-NSCLC and nc-NSCLC were 15.8% and 21.5%, respectively, and no significant difference was found (<em>P</em>=0.765). The Kaplan–Meier method revealed no association between the cavity and OS in NSCLC patients treated with MWA.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>MWA was an effective and safe approach for c-NSCLC treatment. Compared to nc-NSCLC, c-NSCLC presented with more complications but a comparable outcome after MWA.</p>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?