Revealing Ionic Signal Enhancement with Probe Grafting Density on the Outer Surface of Nanochannels

Tianle Liu,Xiaoqing Wu,Hongquan Xu,Qun Ma,Qiujiao Du,Quan Yuan,Pengcheng Gao,Fan Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03010
IF: 7.4
2021-09-14
Analytical Chemistry
Abstract:Probe-modified nanopores/nanochannels are one of the most advanced sensors because the probes interact strongly with ions and targets in nanoconfinement and create a sensitive and selective ionic signal. Recently, ionic signals have been demonstrated to be sensitive to the probe–target interaction on the outer surface of nanopores/nanochannels, which can offer more open space for target recognition and signal conversion than nanoconfined cavities. To enhance the ionic signal, we investigated the effect of grafting density, a critical parameter of the sensing interface, of the probe on the outer surface of nanochannels on the change rate of the ionic signal before and after target recognition (β). Electroneutral peptide nucleic acids and negatively charged DNA are selected as probes and targets, respectively. The experimental results showed that when adding the same number of targets, the β value increased with the probe grafting density on the outer surface. A theoretical model with clearly defined physical properties of each probe and target has been established. Numerical simulations suggest that the decrease of the background current and the aggregation of targets at the mouth of nanochannels with increasing probe grafting density contribute to this enhancement. This work reveals the signal mechanism of probe–target recognition on the outer surface of nanochannels and suggests a general approach to the nanochannel/nanopore design leading to sensitivity improvement on the basis of relatively good selectivity.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03010.Materials; SEM images of PET porous membrane; effect of the probe grafting density on the ionic current before target binding simulated by the common model; I–V curves of PET nanochannels after the modification of PNA probes with different concentrations and hybridization with target DNA; experimental results of ionic current variation with the PNA probe grafting density before adding target and after DNA hybridization; ζ potentials of untreated, directly MCH-sealed, and PNA- or DNA-modified Au nanoparticles; numerical simulation results of the relationship between the PNA probe grafting density and the change rate of the ion current; numerical simulation results of the relationship between the number of DNA targets distributed in different regions of the nanochannel and the ionic signal; effect of the probe grafting density on the ion current simulated with different probes and targets; transmembrane ion current measurement device; models and boundary conditions used in numerical simulations; and PNA and DNA sequences used in this work (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?