Abstract:Abstract Background The population is getting older worldwide, therefore specific knowledge regarding elderly with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasingly needed. Frailty has previously been suggested as a valuable marker for outcome prediction in older CVD patients. Whether the importance of frailty is similar in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not well described. Purpose To compare outcome among frail patients ≥70 years old refereed for coronary angiography (CAG) due to CCS and ACS. Methods Patients ≥70 years old, referred for CAG due to CCS or ACS at our department between 2020-2021, were included in the study and followed for one year. Frailty was evaluated with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) by trained nurses as a part of everyday practice at the cardiology ward. Patients were pooled according to their CFS into a frail/vulnerable (CFS ≥4) and a robust group (CFS 1-3). Study endpoints were all-cause mortality and new hospital admissions for bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularisation, or stroke. Results During the study period, a total of 678 patients ≥70 years underwent CAG due to CCS (n=223) or ACS (n=455), had their level of frailty evaluated and completed one-year follow-up. The prevalence of frailty/vulnerability was higher among patients with CCS as compared to patients with ACS (CCS: 43.0% vs. ACS: 32.2%, p=0.009). Frail/vulnerable patients with CCS were younger (CCS: 76.6 (4.7) years vs. ACS: 79.6 (5.7) years, p<0.001), and had a higher body mass index (CCS: 28.5 (4.6) kg/m2 vs. ACS: 27.1 (5.1) kg/m2). Furthermore, frail/vulnerable patients with CCS had more often a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure and hypercholesteremia. PCI was more frequently performed in frail/vulnerable patients with ACS compared to CCS (CCS 40.6% vs. ACS 54.6%, p=0.043) and the use of coronary artery bypass was very low (CCS 6.2% vs. ACS 4.1%, p=0.637), table 1. At one-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was lower among frail/vulnerable patients with CCS (CCS: 4.2% vs. ACS: 23.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in the number of new hospital admissions for bleeding, MI, unplanned revascularisation, or stroke (CCS: 39.4% vs ACS: 42.0%, p=0.79). In Kaplan Meier analysis, cumulated all-cause mortality was lower among both frail/vulnerable and robust patients with CCS as well as robust patients with ACS, as compared to frail/vulnerable patients with ACS (log-rank p<0.001), figure 1. There was no difference in all-cause mortality among robust patients with CCS, as compared to robust patients with ACS (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-1.27, p=0.11). Conclusion Among patients ≥70 years old referred for CAG, frailty was associated with a higher all-cause mortality in patients with ACS, but not in patients with CCS. Furthermore, there were no differences in one-year all-cause mortality between robust patients with CCS and ACS.Table 1Figure 1

Frailty, cognition and patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged and older adults with congenital heart disease: insights from an international multicentric study

Cognitive Frailty in Relation to Adverse Health Outcomes Independent of Multimorbidity: Results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

Cognitive Frailty in Relation to Adverse Health Outcomes Independent of Multimorbidity in Chinese Older Adults

Frailty in chronic heart failure: a multidimensional assessment of older patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation

Frailty and Cognitive Function in Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Prospective cohort study of elderly patients with coronary artery disease: impact of frailty on quality of life and outcome

Clinical and Psychological Factors Associated with Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure

Abstract 11721: Frailty Assessed by a Composite Assessment of Cognitive and Physical Frailty Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Pre-Clinical Heart Failure Patients

Cognitive frailty in older adults: examining the impact of frailty criteria on neuropsychological profile, functional outcomes, activity levels, and quality of life

Prevalence and impact of frailty in elderly patients with chronic and acute coronary syndrome referred for coronary angiography

Prevalence and determinants of frailty in older adult patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study

Is frailty a prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndrome?

Cognitive Functioning and Psychosocial Outcomes in Adults with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study

Impact of patient-reported frailty on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Is Frailty Associated with Short-Term Outcomes for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Frailty and outcomes in heart failure patients from high-, middle-, and low-income countries

Long-Term Prognostic Value of Cognitive Impairment on Top of Frailty in Older Adults after Acute Coronary Syndrome

Correlation Between Frailty and Coronary Heart Disease in the Elderly

Association between Perceived Health-Related Quality of Life and Depression with Frailty in the FRASNET Study

Evaluation of frailty in geriatric patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac procedure: results of a prospective, cross-sectional study

Relationship between frailty and executive function by age and sex in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging