Abstract:The article is devoted to current problems of ecology and enforcement. Ukraine is not a member of the EU, which makes it impossible to directly apply EU norms in national enforcement practice. However, having been ratified the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part is a full-fledged part of the national legal order, which outlines a range of key issues, in particular, the standards that appear before national legislation as a challenge to cooperation on environmental protection issues, and adaptation to EU legislation. The agreement envisages the strengthening of environmental protection activities through the improvement of the health care system, the preservation of natural resources, the improvement of economic and environmental protection efficiency, the integration of environmental policy into other areas of state policy, as well as the increase of the level of production thanks to modern technologies, which will have positive consequences for citizens and enterprises in Ukraine and the EU. As well as the issue of harmonization of legislation on environmental protection, including the implementation of the UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), which provides for the involvement of the public in the decision-making process on environmental issues and guarantees access to justice for person and public organizations when environmental legislation and/or provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights are violate. The need to analyze domestic judicial practice on environmental legal relations in various jurisdictions is extremely urgent. The application of international ratified documents, in particular the Aarhus Convention, is precisely the source of law that, firstly, opens wide public access to appeal procedures; secondly, it is the legal basis for resolving disputes about compensation for damage to the environment; thirdly, it makes impossible the limited interpretation of the current national legislation of Ukraine, regarding the right to appeal to the court for the protection of an interest protected by law in the sphere of guaranteeing environmental safety; fourthly, guarantees the right to appeal to the court of an unlimited number of persons (can be exercised by citizens personally or jointly through the association of citizens), and the resolution of disputed environmental-legal relations, i.e. those are public; fifth, guarantees the subject of the law access to the court without discrimination based on his actual location or actual center of activity; sixth, it affects the formation of established legal practice in environmental disputes.

The Baltic Sea environment and the European Union: Analysis of governance barriers

The relative power of environmental assessment as a governance tool: organization and the case of the Nord Stream gas pipeline

The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and accomplishments

Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT

Comparing the local use of environmental policy instruments in Nordic and Baltic countries ‐ the issue of diffuse water pollution

Participatory Deliberation, Risk Governance and Management of the Marine Region in the European Union

Policy Diffusion, Environmental Federalism, and Economic Efficiency – How Institutions Influence the Implementation of EU Legislation in Two Nordic Countries

The Interplay Between EU Law and Regional Sea Conventions: Shaping Environmental Protection in Relation to Offshore Energy Production Across Europe?

Positioning the Nordic Countries in European Union Environmental Policy

Left to interest groups? On the prospects for enforcing environmental law in the European Union

Making Transboundary Risks Governable: Reducing Complexity, Constructing Spatial Identity, and Ascribing Capabilities

Ecosystem approaches in the practice of national enforcement

Assessing Costs and Benefits of Measures to Achieve Good Environmental Status in European Regional Seas: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learnt

With or without the European Union: the convention for the protection of the Black Sea against pollution

On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Ocean governance and maritime security in a placeful environment: The case of the European Union

The role of institutional and legal constraints on river water quality monitoring in Ukraine

The External Dimension of European Union Marine Governance: Institutional Interplay between the EU and the International Maritime Organization

An assessment of the scope and effectiveness of soft measures to handle plastic pollution in the Baltic Sea Region

The impact of financial decentralization and investments in green power on the ecology in the European union: How does the governance of institutions moderate this relationship?

FUNDING MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE: EU EXPERIENCE