Abstract:The anchoring effect, one of the most common heuristics, refers to a phenomenon that the assimilation of a quantitative estimates a previously presented irrelative number under uncertain circumstances. Since the anchoring effect was proposed by Tversky and Kahneman in 1974 , lots of research has been done about it. Now there are two main models while account for anchoring effects:the anchoring and adjustment heuristic and the selective accessibility model. But most of researches just focused on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic or the selective accessibility model separately. In recent years, some scholars have pointed out that even if participants have a self-generated anchor, when there is an experimenter-provided anchor showing up at the same time, the processing mechanism of the anchoring effect is not only anchoring and adjustment heuristic, but also may happen to the selective accessibility model at the same time. But no research has been available to prove it yet. Therefore, this study is to try to explore the relationship between anchoring and adjustment heuristic and the selective accessibility model with the self-generated anchor and the experimenter-provided anchor showing up at the same time. A total of 64 undergraduate or graduate students were recruited and paid for their participation. The participants, were placed in separate cubicles in the laboratory, each containing a computer used to present the information and to register the dependent measures. The participants were told that the experiment was about how people made estimates. First, they had to estimate if there was predominance of capital or lower case letters in several letter combinations. After that, they had to make some probability estimates. The letter combination task was used to conceal the true purpose of our experiment. In this task, the participants had to estimate if a letter combination of six letters (e.g. MJFqRe) contained more capital letters or more lower case letters. After the last letter combination, a screen was presented for 5s with the announcement that this was the last letter combination and that they had to make the probability estimate. Immediately after the presentation of this screen, the participants had to estimate:whether (1) the normal boiling point of alcohol was higher than 89 degrees Celsius or below 89 degrees Celsius. Or (2) the normal boiling point of alcohol was higher than 243 degrees Celsius or below 243 degrees Celsius. After the participants’ answer, he/she was told that the numerical value (89/243) was just selected randomly by the computer;it had no value for reference. Then they had to estimate the real degrees Celsius of the boiling point of alcohol. Finally, the participants had to answer whether he/she considered the normal boiling point of water was 100 degrees Celsius, and used it as reference when they were answering what was the normal boiling point of alcohol. The results show that (1) only without self-generated anchors is there a significant difference in participants’ estimates between those exposed to the high anchor and those exposed to the low anchor. (2) Only with self-generated anchors is there a significant difference in participants’ estimated response latencies between those exposed to the high anchor and those exposed to the low anchor. The results of our study suggest that the anchoring and adjustment heuristic are more dominant than the selective accessibility model when they show up at the same time. The consistency of anchor information will affect different processing mechanisms’ activation, anchor-consistent information will activate the selective accessibility model, and anchor-inconsistent information will activate anchoring and adjustment heuristic, which makes the participants’ estimated reaction time longer than the former.

Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic

Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: an investigation with optokinetic stimulation

Spatial Bias Induced by Simple Addition and Subtraction: from Eye Movement Evidence.

Long-term Abacus Training Induces Automatic Processing of Abacus Numbers in Children.

Spatial attention in mental arithmetic: A literature review and meta-analysis

Numerical Processing Efficiency Improved in Children Using Mental Abacus: ERP Evidence Utilizing a Numerical Stroop Task

Numerical Magnitude Processing in Abacus-Trained Children with Superior Mathematical Ability: an Eeg Study

Dynamic Mental Number Line in Simple Arithmetic

Numbers, space, and spatial attention: Operational momentum in non-symbolic and symbolic mental arithmetic, and number-line estimation in preschool children

Attentional bias induced by stimulus control (ABC) impairs measures of the approximate number system

Operator priming and generalization of practice in adults' simple arithmetic

Number representation is influenced by numerical processing level: an ERP study

Judgment in the presence of multiple conflicting anchors

The Anchoring Effects in Differential Sources of Anchor Information:How Experimenter-Provided Anchors and Self-generated Anchors Affect the Dual-Processing Model

The Effect of Numerical and Physical Anchors on the Decision Processes of Duration Estimation

Mental Representations Of Arithmetic Facts: Evidence From Eye Movement Recordings Supports The Preferred Operand-Order-Specific Representation Hypothesis

Quantitative and Qualitative Differences in the Canonical and the Reverse Distance Effect and Their Selective Association With Arithmetic and Mathematical Competencies

Anchoring Bias in Online Voting

Symbolic and Non-Symbolic numbers differently affect centre identification in a number-line bisection task

Fooling with facts: Quantifying anchoring bias through a large-scale online experiment

Retracted: Simple Mental Arithmetic is Not So Simple: an Erp Study of the Split and Odd-Even Effects in Mental Arithmetic (retracted Article. See Vol. 528, Pg. 92, 2012)