Transcriptional response of Thialkalivibrio versutus D301 to different sulfur sources and identification of the sulfur oxidation pathways

Zhi-Xia Liu,Mao-Hua Yang,Ting-Zhen Mu,Jin-Long Liu,Xiang Zhang,Jian-Min Xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.02.003
IF: 3.595
2021-03-01
Journal of Biotechnology
Abstract:<p>The genus <em>Thialkalivibrio</em> plays an essential role in the biological desulfurization system. However, to date, the sulfur oxidation pathways of <em>Thialkalivibrio</em> are not clearly understood. Here, we performed transcriptomic analysis on <em>Thialkalivibrio versutus</em> D301 with either thiosulfate or chemical sulfur as the sulfur source to understand it. The results show that <em>T. versutus</em> D301 has a higher growth rate and sulfur oxidation activity when thiosulfate is utilized. The use of chemical sulfur as sulfur source leads to decreased expression of genes involved in carbon metabolism, ribosome synthesis and oxidative phosphorylation in <em>T. versutus</em> D301. Potentially due to the adsorption to sulfur particles, the genes related to flagellum assembly and motivation are significantly induced in <em>T. versutus</em> D301 in the presence of chemical sulfur. In the periplasm, both thiosulfate and polysulfide from the chemical sulfur are oxidized to sulfate <em>via</em> the similar truncated Sox system (SoxAXYZB). Then, part of polysulfide reached to cytoplasm through an unidentified route is oxidized to sulfite by the Dsr-like system. The sulfite in the cytoplasm is further catalyzed to sulfate by SoxB or SoeABC. Overall, the difference in the oxidation rates of D301 can be mainly attributed to the bioavailability of the two sulfur sources, not the sulfur oxidation pathways.</p>
biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?