Response of abiotic soil CO2 flux to the difference in air-soil temperature in a desert

Yang Gao,Zhong Zhao,Yuqing Zhang,Jiabin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147377
2021-09-01
Abstract:<p>Abiotic soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux (<em>F</em><sub>a</sub>) has been observed in drylands worldwide, while its generation mechanism is not determined. The remarkable features for the occurrence time of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub>, that the positive <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub> emission from soil) and negative <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub> absorption by soil) generally occurred in the daytime and nighttime, respectively, suggested that the generation of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> is related to temperature. Previous studies have focused on the sole effect of soil temperature (<em>T</em><sub>s</sub>) or air temperature (<em>T</em><sub>a</sub>) on <em>F</em><sub>a</sub>, but very little is regarding to the overall response of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> to both <em>T</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>s</sub> in the air-soil system. In the Mu Us Desert, China, we continuously measured the hourly <em>F</em><sub>a</sub>, <em>T</em><sub>s</sub>, <em>T</em><sub>a</sub> and the difference between <em>T</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>s</sub> (<em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub>) at 4-day intervals from June to October 2016. During this period, soil abiotically absorbed atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at a rate of 0.32 ± 0.19 g m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>. <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> was not correlated with <em>T</em><sub>s</sub> and was weakly correlated with <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>, however, it was strongly and positively correlated with <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub>. A quadratic model adequately fitted the relationship between <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub>, and similar relationships were also observed between positive <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub> and between negative <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub>. The results of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> measurement highlight that desert soils can absorb CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere through abiotic processes. The relationships of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> with <em>T</em><sub>s</sub>, <em>T</em><sub>a</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub> indicate that, abiotic CO<sub>2</sub> exchange between soil and atmosphere depends on air-soil temperature gradient in desert. Furthermore, the thermal convection driven by <em>T</em><sub>a</sub>-<em>T</em><sub>s</sub> may play a major role in the generation of nocturnal negative <em>F</em><sub>a</sub>. Our findings provide a new possible perspective for revealing the reasons of <em>F</em><sub>a</sub> generation in drylands.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the mechanisms of abiotic carbon dioxide flux (Fa) between soil and atmosphere in desert areas and attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Temperature Dependence of Abiotic CO₂ Flux**: The paper investigates the effects of soil temperature (Ts), air temperature (Ta), and the air-soil temperature gradient (Ta-Ts) on abiotic CO₂ flux. The study finds that although soil temperature and air temperature alone do not significantly affect Fa, there is a significant positive correlation between the air-soil temperature gradient (Ta-Ts) and Fa. 2. **Diurnal Variation Pattern**: The study indicates that during the day, the soil typically emits CO₂ (positive Fa), while at night, it absorbs CO₂ (negative Fa). This diurnal variation pattern suggests that temperature may be an important factor influencing the generation of Fa. 3. **Thermal Convection**: The paper proposes a hypothesis that thermal convection driven by the air-soil temperature gradient may be the main mechanism for the generation of negative Fa at night. The study experimentally demonstrates that during the measurement period, desert soil absorbed a significant amount of CO₂ from the atmosphere through abiotic processes, with an average rate of 0.32 ± 0.19 g m⁻²d⁻¹. In summary, the paper attempts to reveal the mechanisms of abiotic CO₂ flux in desert soil through experimental data and emphasizes the critical role of the temperature gradient in this process.