129 RE-THINKING THE MEMORY CONSENSUS MEETING: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
M Costello,N Munawar,I Bruce,L Crosby,D Burgui,M Finnegan,MC McKenna,S Hutchinson,C Crowe,E Greene,I Leori,D Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac218.108
2022-10-25
Age and Ageing
Abstract:Abstract Background As part of our memory clinic service, weekly consensus meetings are held to allow for multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation of new cases. As part of a local Quality Improvement (QI) initiative, we reviewed how this meeting could be streamlined to maximise efficiency and improve diagnostic accuracy in light of increasing referrals and patient complexity. Here we describe the development and initial implementation of this QI project. Methods A structured QI approach was taken to develop SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) goals. All professional stakeholders (from disciplines including geriatric medicine, neurology and psychiatry of later life) who attend the weekly consensus meeting were surveyed anonymously with a response rate of 80% (n=8). Information was gathered on areas that worked well, areas that needed improvement and suggestions for meeting enhancement. In addition, participants were asked at a single meeting to subjectively rate the complexity of eleven cases presented into the following categories: low, medium and high. Data were collated and presented to the memory clinic staff for further refinement. Results Four key actions were identified for implementation: formal allocation of a meeting chair, improvement of access to imaging from outside hospitals, revision of current proforma to streamline case discussions, and proposal to discuss patients in order of new assessment, return assessment and review of significant results. During the rating of case complexity, there was substantial variation among respondents. Conclusion This initial phase has been used to develop SMART goals to improve the consensus meeting structure. We identified that patient complexity would be an inefficient method to order case discussion. Implementation of action steps are ongoing, with positive feedback from staff to date.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology