Technology sourcing ambidexterity in corporate venture capital: limitations of learning from open innovation

Sergey Alexander Anokhin,Manuel Hess,Joakim Wincent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00900-8
IF: 7.096
2024-02-14
Small Business Economics
Abstract:In the rapidly evolving landscape of open innovation, understanding the dynamics of learning is pivotal for corporate success. Yet, the constraints and thresholds inherent in the novel technology sourcing processes remain under-explored. We study 163 firms during the third wave of corporate venture capital activity characterized by the primary focus on innovation to investigate the effects of technology sourcing ambidexterity (the simultaneous pursuit of internal and external sources of innovative ideas) on corporate patenting and realized innovation. Acknowledging limitations of organizational learning, our results indicate the presence of the inverted U-shaped relationship between technology sourcing ambidexterity and innovation and suggest that beyond a certain threshold, increases in ambidexterity are detrimental to organizational learning and corporate innovation because boundary conditions to experimentation as a key element to learning arise. Such restrictions are alleviated by organizational slack, which enhances organizational abilities to orchestrate resources and take calculated risks to go beyond existing internal competencies.
economics,business,management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Address The paper attempts to explore how companies balance internal and external sources of innovation when engaging in technological innovation and examines the impact of this balance on organizational innovation capability. Specifically: 1. **Technology Sourcing Ambidexterity**: - Investigates how companies balance between internal R&D and external investments (such as through Corporate Venture Capital (CVC)). - Explores the impact of this balance on the company's patent output and actual innovation. 2. **Limitations of Learning**: - Research indicates that when companies overly rely on external sources of innovation, they encounter a learning threshold, where further increasing external innovation sources can actually harm the organization's learning and innovation capabilities. - Proposes an inverted U-shaped relationship, where moderate technology sourcing ambidexterity can enhance innovation capability, but beyond a certain threshold, further increasing ambidexterity becomes detrimental. 3. **Role of Organizational Slack**: - Discusses how organizational slack (referring to the surplus resources a company possesses) can mitigate learning limitations and enhance the organization's ability to handle complex experiments. - In resource-abundant situations, organizations find it easier to conduct innovative experiments, thereby achieving higher innovation capability. Through these studies, the paper aims to provide strategic recommendations for companies on how to optimize internal and external sources of innovation and explain why some companies are better able to leverage the open innovation paradigm.