Abstract:Stakeholder management researchers have recently put a lot of effort into figuring out why organizations facing extensive pressure respond differently to social responsibilities. In particular, ethics researchers believe that senior management must drive corporate social responsibility since their attitudes toward such issues are so important. In line with this sentiment, our study develops a framework of management power, composed of CEOs’ power and the organizations’ power, and explores how managerial power heterogeneity affects the corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of a firm. Using sample data from the largest emerging market—China—for the period 2010–2018, we submit that CEOs with structural power and shareholders with the highest concentration tend to show a lower commitment to CSR activities. On the other hand, we recognize that the ownership, expertise, and prestige power of CEOs’, the supervision, monitoring, and political power of the board can improve a firms’ CSR performance. These results are also validated by using a fixed effect model, two stage least square (2-SLS) regression, and the propensity score matching (PSM) technique. Our results imply that the implementation of social policies fundamentally results not only from powerful CEOs, but also from powerful boards and shareholders. Moreover, our study provides useful implications with regard to the social outcomes of power authorized by CEOs and the organizations.

Application of upper echelon theory for corporate social responsibility dimensions: Evidence from the restaurant industry

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Airline Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Social Responsibility

How Does CEO Social Class Perception Impact Employee-Related CSR? Evidence from Privately Owned Chinese Firms

CEO Social Class Perception and Employee-Related CSR: Evidence from Chinese Privately Owned Firms

CEO Attributes and Firm Performance in the Hospitality Industry

MBA CEOs and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China

Effects of CEO Overseas Experience on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies

The Impact of Employee Perceptions of Organizational Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from the Chinese Private Sector

CEO Career Horizon and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance

Trust and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from CEO’s Early Experience

Corporate social responsibility, CEO characteristics, and earnings management: Evidence from China

Echoes of CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation: How and when CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation Influences Dual CSR Activities

Do Academic CEOs Influence Corporate Social Irresponsibility? the Moderating Effects of Negative Attainment Discrepancy and Slack Resources

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

Executive Compensation of SOEs and Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence from China

Trust and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from CEO's early experience

CEO Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility

Internal Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Companies

Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance

Not all stakeholders are created equal: executive vertical pay disparity and firms’ choice of internal and external CSR