Abstract:Foot &Ankle International, Ahead of Print. Background:Somatic nerve pain is one of the most common complications following surgery of the foot and ankle but may also arise following traumatic injury or chronic nerve compression. The sural nerve is a commonly affected nerve in the foot and ankle; it is at risk given the proximity to frequently used surgical approaches, exposure to crush injuries, and traction from severe ankle inversion injuries. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of sural nerve neurectomy with proximal implantation for sural neuromas (SN) and chronic sural neuritis (CSN).Methods:Patients that underwent neurectomy with proximal implantation (20 muscle, 1 adipose tissue) by 2 foot and ankle specialists for isolated SN- and CSN-related pain at a single tertiary institution were included. Demographic data, baseline outcomes including 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. Final follow-up questionnaires using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) lower extremity function, pain interference (PI), and neuropathic pain quality, FAAM, and VAS were administered using REDCap. Perioperative factors including neuropathic medications, diagnostic injections, the use of collagen wraps, and perioperative ketamine were collected from the medical record. Descriptive statistics were performed and potential changes in patient-reported outcome measure scores were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.Results:The 21 patients meeting inclusion criteria for this study had a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43-49) and had median follow-up duration of 33.7 months (IQR, 4.5-47.6). Median FAAM activities of daily living score improved from 40.6 (38.7-50.7) preoperatively to 66.1 (53.6-83.3) postoperatively, P = .032. FAAM sports scores improved from 14.1 (7.8-21.9) to 41.1 (25.0-60.9) postoperatively, P = .002. VAS scores improved from a median of 9.0 (8.0-9.0) to 3.0 (3.0-6.0), P < .001. At final follow-up, patients reported PROMIS lower extremity function score median of 43.8 (35.6-54.9), PROMIS neuropathic pain quality score of 54.1 (43.6-61.6), and PROMIS PI of 57.7 (41.1-63.8). Patients with both anxiety and depression reported less improvement in pain and physical. Other perioperative factors lacked sufficient numbers for statistical analysis.Conclusion:Sural nerve neurectomy and proximal implantation (20 muscle, 1 adipose) provided significant improvement in pain and function for patients with sural neuromas and chronic sural neuritis at median follow-up of 33.7 months. Anxiety and depression were associated with significantly poorer outcomes following surgery. Patients with CRPS as well as recent nicotine use tended to report less improvement in pain and worse function after surgery, although this sample size was too limited for statistical analysis of these variables. Further research is needed to identify the ideal surgical candidates and perioperative factors to optimize patient outcomes.Level of Evidence:Level IV, retrospective case series.

Postoperative Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Electrodiagnosis in Patients With Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Factors correlating with positive electrodiagnostic findings for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

Comparing endoscopic and conventional surgery techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study

Accuracy of Surgeon Diagnosis in Predicting Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Endoscopic Versus Open Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Postoperative Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Retrospective analysis of 242 patients whose carpal tunnels were released using a one-port endoscopic procedure: superior results of early intervention

Intraindividual comparison between open and endoscopic release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Differences in the Postoperative Outcomes According to the Primary Treatment Options Chosen by Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment

Pre-operative Two-Point Discrimination Predicts Response to Carpal Tunnel Release

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Sural Neuritis: A Retrospective Case Series

458 Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: An Umbrella Review and a Meta-Analysis

Surgical outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in 100 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years

Positive sensory symptoms, in surgically managed patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A long term follow‑up

Predictive Factors for Converting Endoscopic to Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Factors associated with improvement in tibialis anterior weakness due to lumbar degenerative disease

Algorithm Versus Expert: Machine Learning Versus Surgeon-Predicted Symptom Improvement After Carpal Tunnel Release

Evaluation of electrophysiological examinations for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release

Comparison of the Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Surgery and Nonsurgical Intervention in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

How Does Nerve Mechanical Interface Treatment Impact Pre-Surgical Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial