Abstract:Background: The association between poor social relationships and post-stroke mortality remains uncertain, and the evidence regarding the relationship between poor social relationships and the risk of stroke is inconsistent. In this meta-analysis, we aim to elucidate the evidence concerning the risk of stroke and post-stroke mortality among individuals experiencing a poor social relationships, including social isolation, limited social networks, lack of social support, and loneliness. Methods: A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to systematically identify pertinent studies. Data extraction was independently performed by two researchers. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the reliability of the results. Random-effects meta-regression was performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity in stroke risk estimates between studies. Assessment for potential publication bias was carried out using Egger's and Begg's tests. Results: Nineteen studies were included, originating from 4 continents and 12 countries worldwide. A total of 1,675,707 participants contributed to this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses under the random effect model revealed a significant association between poor social relationships and the risk of stroke (OR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.17-1.44), as well as increased risks for post-stroke mortality (OR = 1.36; 95%CI: 1.07-1.73). Subgroup analyses demonstrated associations between limited social network (OR = 1.52; 95%CI = 1.04-2.21), loneliness (OR = 1.31; 95%CI = 1.13-1.51), and lack of social support (OR = 1.66; 95%CI = 1.04-2.63) with stroke risk. The meta-regression explained 75.21% of the differences in reported stroke risk between studies. Random-effect meta-regression results indicate that the heterogeneity in the estimated risk of stroke may originate from the continent and publication year of the included studies. Conclusion: Social isolation, limited social networks, lack of social support, and feelings of loneliness have emerged as distinct risk factors contributing to both the onset and subsequent mortality following a stroke. It is imperative for public health policies to prioritize the multifaceted influence of social relationships and loneliness in stroke prevention and post-stroke care. Trial registration: The protocol was registered on May 1, 2024, on the Prospero International Prospective System with registration number CRD42024531036.

Impact of selective reporting bias on stroke trials: potential compromise in evidence synthesis - A cross-sectional study

Poststroke Depression and Risk of Stroke Recurrence and Mortality: Protocol of a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study

Assessment of methodological quality and outcome measures of acute stroke randomized controlled trials in China in recent 15 years.

Clinical evidence in ischemic stroke: Where we have gone so far and hopes for the future

Abstract WMP58: Underrepresentation of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Stroke Clinical Trials

Effect of stroke screening survey on intravenous thrombolysis and long-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients: the real- world evidence from Shanghai, China

Critical Insights on Truthfully Reporting "Success Rates" in Modern Stroke Research: A Cautionary Tale

Impact of Evidence-Based Stroke Care on Patient Outcomes: A Multilevel Analysis of an International Study

Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events

Abstract TP68: the Characteristics of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Clinical Trials over the Past Twenty Years: Implications for Future Trial Design

The impact of social relationships on the risk of stroke and post-stroke mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Five Leading Neurology Journals in 2008 and 2013 Using the Modified "risk of Bias" Tool

Abstract HUP12: Underrepresentation Of Racial And Ethnic Minorities In Stroke Clinical Trials

Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review

Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Ophthalmic Diseases Related Randomized Controlled Trials Published in SCI Journals from Mainland China

Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature

Diagnostic accuracy of major stroke types in Chinese adults: A clinical adjudication study involving 40,000 stroke cases

The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in pharmacotherapy for pituitary adenomas

Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals

Utilization and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Clinical Trials of Acute Stroke (2010–2020)