Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

#BlackRepresentationsMatter: Viewing digital activism through symbology

Rethinking digital activism

When the Black lives that matter are not our own: digital Black feminism and a dialectic of self and community

What Truly Matters? Using Linguistic Cues for Analyzing the #BlackLivesMatter Movement and its Counter Protests: 2013 to 2020

Embodiment in activist images: addressing the role of the body in digital activism

What is digital activism anyway?

Digitally Mediated Protest: Social Media Affordances for Collective Identity Construction

When Algorithms Shape Collective Action: Social Media and the Dynamics of Cloud Protesting

Revisiting digital defense and Black feminism on social media

Local–Digital Activism: Place, Social Media, Body, and Violence in Changing Urban Politics

Evolution of digital activism on social media: opportunities and challenges

Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media

(Re)claiming subversive spaces on TikTok: the complexities of body activisms within physical activity cultures

New Media and the Power of Youth Organizing: Minding the Gaps

The construction and mobilization of political consumerism through digital media in a networked social movement

Short Video Uprising: How #BlackLivesMatter Content on TikTok Challenges the Protest Paradigm

Digital Pleasure and Danger

A new culture of advocacy: An exploratory analysis of social activism on the web and social media

Young Humans Make Change, Young Users Click: Creating Youth-Centered Networked Social Movements

"I'm Going to be Visible Because... That's What's Gonna Help Other People Like Me": Young Black Trans and Gender Diverse People's Experiences in Activism Work

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study